Madrid v. Stone

Filing 12

ORDERED that the Court VACATES re 8 November 2nd Report and Recommendation. The Court DIRECTS Respondent's counsel to re-serve the motion to dismiss on Petitioner at his new address. Petitioner shall have through and including December 9, 2022, to file a response. If Petitioner fails to respond, the Court will deem the motion unopposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/18/22. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION WILSON MADRID, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, USP ATLANTA, Respondent. 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) _________ CV 322-106 ORDER _________ Based on Respondent’s recent notice of Petitioner’s address change following closure of McRae Correctional Facility (“McRae”), it appears the motion to dismiss was served on Petitioner at McRae on October 6, 2022, a week after he departed for a new prison on September 29, 2022. (Doc. no. 7, p. 10; doc. no. 11.) Because Petitioner did not receive the motion to dismiss prior to the Court issuing a recommendation that Respondent’s dispositive motion be granted, out of an abundance of caution the Court VACATES the November 2nd Report and Recommendation (Doc. no. 8.) The Court DIRECTS Respondent’s counsel to re-serve the motion to dismiss on Petitioner at his new address. Petitioner shall have through and including December 9, 2022, 1 The Court DIRECTS the CLERK, to update the docket in accordance with the above caption to reflect the warden at Petitioner’s current prison as the Respondent. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004) (explaining proper respondent in § 2241 case is warden of institution where the petitioner is confined). to file a response. If Petitioner fails to respond, the Court will deem the motion unopposed. See Loc. R. 7.5. SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2022, at Augusta, Georgia. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?