LAIDLER v. HARDY et al

Filing 8

ORDER directing service re 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/25/24. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION SAMUEL LAIDLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LT. HARDY; WARDEN PROCEROR; ) WARDEN CHAMBAL; and WARDEN ) BRAGG, ) ) 1 ) Defendants. _________ CV 324-076 ORDER _________ Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by no later than December 12, 2024, must specify each proposed finding of fact and conclusion of law to which objection is made, must state the bases for each such objection, and must be served upon all parties. Failure to file objections by this deadline may result in this Report and Recommendation becoming the opinion and order of the Court. Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Failure to object to any proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s adoption of each such factual finding or legal conclusion. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. The Clerk will submit this Report and Recommendation together with any objections to United States District Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., on December 13, 2024. The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to update Defendants’ names and titles on the docket in accordance with the above caption, which is consistent with Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. no. 1, pp. 1, 3.) 1 Requests for extension of time to file objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned. A party may not appeal this Report and Recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final judgment. SO ORDERED this 25th day of November, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?