LAIDLER v. HARDY et al
Filing
8
ORDER directing service re 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/25/24. (loh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBLIN DIVISION
SAMUEL LAIDLER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
LT. HARDY; WARDEN PROCEROR;
)
WARDEN CHAMBAL; and WARDEN
)
BRAGG,
)
)
1
)
Defendants.
_________
CV 324-076
ORDER
_________
Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by no later than December
12, 2024, must specify each proposed finding of fact and conclusion of law to which objection
is made, must state the bases for each such objection, and must be served upon all parties.
Failure to file objections by this deadline may result in this Report and Recommendation
becoming the opinion and order of the Court. Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F.
App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Failure to object to any proposed finding of
fact or conclusion of law waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s adoption
of each such factual finding or legal conclusion. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. The Clerk will submit this
Report and Recommendation together with any objections to United States District Judge
Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., on December 13, 2024.
The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to update Defendants’ names and titles on the docket in
accordance with the above caption, which is consistent with Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. no. 1, pp. 1, 3.)
1
Requests for extension of time to file objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court
for consideration by the undersigned.
A party may not appeal this Report and
Recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Appeals may be made only from a final judgment.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of November, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?