Davis v. Williams et al

Filing 26

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the case should be dismissed without prejudice. re 1 Complaint filed by Lin Edward Davis, 15 Amended Complaint filed by Lin Edward Davis Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/5/09. (wwp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. THALRONE WILLIAMS, DR. C. FOGAM, OFFICER JONES, PAT TABER, SIGHT, and BOARD OF PARDON AND PAROLE, Defendants. ) ) ) )

Case No. CV407-024

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 15, 2009, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for his failure to answer truthfully the question on his civil complaint form that inquired about his prior lawsuits. Doc. 25. Plaintiff did not respond to that Order. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court's inherent power to police its docket, plaintiff's case should be

DISMISSED without prejudice for his failure to prosecute this action.
L.R. 41(b) (authorizing dismissal for neglect of any Court order); see Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626,630-31 (1962); Mingo v. Sugar Cane

Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Floyd v. United States, No. CV491-277 (S.D. Ga. June 10, 1992). SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED this 5th day of February, 2009.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

2