Doye v. Colvin et al

Filing 106

ORDER denying as moot 102 MOTION to Compel filed by Noel Romero Doye. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 09/22/2010. (lmm)

Download PDF
Doye v. Colvin et al Doc. 106 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION NOEL ROMERO DOYE, Plaintiff, v. JASON COLVIN, Sheriff Deputy; CAPTAIN BRUCE DUNCAN, ) ) ) ) Case No. CV408-174 Assistant Administrator; LIEUTENANT LISA BOYD; and DOUG FRANKS, Jail Administrator; Defendants. ORDER Civil rights plaintiff Noel Romero Doye has filed a "motion to compel discovery." (Doc. 102.) He does not complain that defendants have refused to provide discovery but instead argues that they have unfairly attempted to charge him $200 for access to some of the information he requested. (Id. at 1.) Defendants concede that they have attempted to charge him for copies, but "in the interest of moving this case forward," they now agree to provide him his documents at no Dockets.Justia.com cost. 1 (Doc. 105.at 2.) Given this concession, the motion to compel is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2010. UNITED S'IAThS LGIST1A[E JUDGE SC)LTIIIERN DISTRICT of GEORGIA Defendants correctly contend that despite plaintiff's indigence, he should have to bear such discovery-related expenses. (Doc. 105.) See Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 158-59 (3d Cir. 1993), quoted in doc. 41 at 3, available at 2009 WL 764980 at *1. As one court has explained, "although a party must produce documents for inspection at a time and a place specified by the party seeking production, Rule 34 does not require the producing party to pay the costs of giving the opposing party copies of those documents. If the inspecting party wishes copies of documents, he must pay the cost of reproduction himself." Norwood v. Radtke, 2008 WL 260189 at *1-2 (W.D. Wis. Jan. 8, 2008). Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for courts to afford some latitude to an indigent litigant and require the opposing party to furnish certain discovery material free of charge, particularly jailers who maintain the requested files at the institution where a plaintiff is confined. 2 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?