Johns v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Dismissing the Case. Signed by Chief Judge William T. Moore on 11/23/2009. (loh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Z9 NOV 2 3 'M i0= SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION RICKY E. JOHNS, Claimant, v. ----^ ) Case No. CV408-190 COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. R ORDER After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. SO ORDERED this day of 2009. WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., CH JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION RICKY E. JOHNS, Claimant, V. Case No. CV408-190 COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Claimant Ricky Johns filed this social security appeal on September 26, 2008, but has since abandoned any effort to litigate it. (Doc. 1.) He has failed, for example, to brief his position, despite a generous briefing deadline extension granted by the Court. (Doe: 25.) The Court thus directed him to show cause why his case should not be dismissed. (Doc. 27.) It gave him 15 days to do so, but he has not responded. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court's inherent power to police its docket, claimant's case should be DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to obey this Court's order. Local Rule 41(b) (authorizing dismissal for neglect of any Court order); see Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626,63031 (1962); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. /A 1989); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983) SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED this 26th day of October, 2009. IsI G.R. SMITH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGiA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?