Lowe v. Unnamed Defendant

Filing 4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that case be Dismissed without prejudice re 1 Complaint filed by Kenneth Lowe Objections to R&R due by 5/25/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/8/2009. (mah)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION KENNETH LOWE, Petitioner, v. UNNAMED DEFENDANT, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV409-010 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Kenneth Lowe's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition was transferred from the Northern District of Georgia to this Court on January 16, 2009.1 (Doc. 3.) Upon receiving the petition, the Court noted that Lowe had not submitted a filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Consequently, it directed the Clerk to send petitioner a packet containing a deficiency notice and the Court's standard in forma pauperis motion. The deficiency notice directed Lowe to submit the filing fee or in forma pauperis motion by April 24, 2009. He did not comply and has apparently abandoned his claim. Accordingly, this case should be DISMISSED without prejudice The Northern District construed Lowe's "Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Bond" as a petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 2.) 1 for failure to pay the filing fee or move to proceed IFP. See Rule 3(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (applicable to § 2241 petitions through Rule 1(b)); 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED this8th day of May, 2009. !s! G.R. SMITH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?