Whitehead v. J.I. Financial, LLC et al

Filing 37

ORDER granting 36 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/13/2011. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR!:. THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ,i L f 3 ?1O.t+S SAVANNAH DIVISION DELETTRIA WHITEHEAD,, Individually and as class representative for all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, V. CASE NO. CV410-262 LI. FINANCIAL, LLC; LUFTMAN HECK & ASSOCIATES, LLC, f/k/a Forna, Luftman & Heck, LLC; JEREMIAH HECK; and UNKNOWN PARTIES A, B, C, and D, whose real and proper identities are unknown at present; Defendants. ORDER Before the CoUrt is the parties' Joint Motion for Remand of Action to Superior court of Toombs County. (Doc. 36.) This action was originally removed pursuant to the provisions of The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). The party that removed this action, former' Defendant Global Client Solutions, LLC, originally alleged that the amount in controversy equaled $5.25 million, satisfying the $5 million threshold required by CAFA, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) (2) . (Doc. 36 at 3.) If the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction 1 The parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice (Doc. 26) as to this Defendant on January 19, 2011. in a removed action at any time before final judgment, the case should be remanded. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). In this motion, the parties agree that, through discovery, 'it has . . . become apparent that the jurisdictional amount required to satisfy the CAFA is not satisfied in this action." (Doc. 36 ¶ 2.) After careful consideration the Court finds that it l.cks subject matter jurisdiction and, therefore, this motion is GRANTED. This action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of Toombs County. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED this 13 day of July 2011. WILLIAM T. MOORE, . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?