Nix v. United States Of America

Filing 29

ORDER dismissing 27 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Thomas Edward Nix. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 8/22/17. (wwp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTTOR TIIE SOUTHERN DISTRTCT OF. GEORGTA.I SAVANN|AH DIVISION T H O M A S E D W A R DN ] X , Pet it ioner C A S E N O S . C V 41 1 - 1 6 0 cR409-164 UNlTED STATES OF AI4ER]CA, Paen^n.'lanl- ORDER Before the Pursuant Reconsideration (Doc. claim. Rufe Federal '.T n-nrrids -elic' f rn'r Whisby, 323 E. States 2AA9). Petitioner's federaf court ' s merirs." Perers v. UnjLed States. 443631, *l Cir. is (11th t is nrrc t.aa.\l nrorli 2AI1 ) . more accuratefy 2255 motion. must first motion Because the "obtain in result a an order from this Petitioner To the extent that recons iderat i on, the Court sees no prror order. as i e a "the on the 2017 WL successive rr to S Petitioner author.izing moral reason Cir. Petitioner's success.ive, Courr on claim F. App'x _, _ is attack not CaSe." (1lth 182 a this "does Criminal an of rrt i.\n characterized motion 50 (b) a fact As consider 781. App'x 60 (b) (6) .1 Pro. to 'n i ldtnenf for Motion Civ. Procedure Civif e R. jurisdiction Unlted motion v: of Pet1tloner's Fed. to Iacks The Court 21 .J .LS Court the - - = - - - - * ni 9 dlsturb its roc,roef district court Petitjoner has to consider not Jacks jurisdicLLon Petitioner's is the received to Motion consider motion. " Id. at *2. such authorization, rhe motion, Reconsideration Id, Pursuant Because t.he Court AccordingLy, to Rule 50(b) DISMfSSED. t S O O R D E R E Dh i s 3,, oay or August lul / WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. U N f T E D S T A T E SD I S T R I C T C O U R T SOUTHERN ISTRICT OI' GEORGIA D

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?