Nix v. United States Of America
Filing
29
ORDER dismissing 27 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Thomas Edward Nix. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 8/22/17. (wwp)
IN
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTTOR
TIIE SOUTHERN DISTRTCT OF. GEORGTA.I
SAVANN|AH DIVISION
T H O M A S E D W A R DN ] X ,
Pet it ioner
C A S E N O S . C V 41 1 - 1 6 0
cR409-164
UNlTED STATES OF AI4ER]CA,
Paen^n.'lanl-
ORDER
Before
the
Pursuant
Reconsideration
(Doc.
claim.
Rufe
Federal
'.T
n-nrrids
-elic'
f rn'r
Whisby,
323 E.
States
2AA9).
Petitioner's
federaf
court ' s
merirs."
Perers v.
UnjLed States.
443631,
*l
Cir.
is
(11th
t
is
nrrc
t.aa.\l
nrorli
2AI1 ) .
more accuratefy
2255 motion.
must first
motion
Because the
"obtain
in
result
a
an order
from this
Petitioner
To the
extent
that
recons iderat i on, the Court sees no
prror order.
as
i e
a
"the
on
the
2017 WL
successive
rr
to
S
Petitioner
author.izing
moral
reason
Cir.
Petitioner's
success.ive,
Courr
on
claim
F. App'x _,
_
is
attack
not
CaSe."
(1lth
182
a
this
"does
Criminal
an
of
rrt i.\n
characterized
motion
50 (b)
a
fact
As
consider
781.
App'x
60 (b) (6) .1
Pro.
to
'n
i ldtnenf
for
Motion
Civ.
Procedure
Civif
e
R.
jurisdiction
Unlted
motion
v:
of
Pet1tloner's
Fed.
to
Iacks
The Court
21 .J
.LS
Court
the
- - = - - - - * ni 9
dlsturb
its
roc,roef
district
court
Petitjoner
has
to
consider
not
Jacks jurisdicLLon
Petitioner's
is
the
received
to
Motion
consider
motion. "
Id.
at
*2.
such authorization,
rhe motion,
Reconsideration
Id,
Pursuant
Because
t.he Court
AccordingLy,
to
Rule
50(b)
DISMfSSED.
t
S O O R D E R E Dh i s
3,,
oay or August lul /
WILLIAM T.
MOORE, JR.
U N f T E D S T A T E SD I S T R I C T C O U R T
SOUTHERN ISTRICT OI' GEORGIA
D
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?