OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Moore et al

Filing 9

ORDERED that within fourteen days plaintiff shall show good cause why its case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 10/29/2012. (loh)

Download PDF
UNITED::STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION OOIDA RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) Case No. CV411-271 ) WILLIAM DAIRNELL MOORE, as special ) Administrator of the estate of CHARLES ) GARY MOORE, VICTOR ARZILLO ) D/B/A SUGARTOWN EXPRESS AND ) RICHARD E. BATH, ) Defendants ORDER Plaintiff Ooida Risk Retention Group, Inc., filed this Declaratory Judgment action on October 26, 2011 (doc. 1) and successfully served defendants Victor Arzillo and Richard E. Barth on November 16, 2011. Docs. 7 & 8. The record shows no activity since. Within 14 days plaintiff shall show good cause why its case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 41(b).' 1 "The district court possesses the inherent power to police its docket" and to prune from its docket those cases that amount to no more than mere deadwood. Collins v. Lake Helen, L.P., 249 F. App'x 116, 120 (11th Cir. 2007) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962)); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir.1989). SO ORDERED, this,Iay of October, 2012. TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?