First Chatham Bank v. Mischler Lawson Development Company, LLC et al

Filing 28

ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for $485,948.61 and against the defendants Miscshler Lawson, LLC., and William J. Mischler. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/25/14. (wwp) Modified on 3/26/2014 (wwp).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION FIRST CHATHAM BANK, Plaintiff, V. 4:13-cv-94 MISCHLER LAWSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC and WILLIAM J. MISCHLER, attorney's fees. Compare, e.g., ECF No. 26-2 atl, with id at 8. The Plaintiff argues that in the absence of a defined percentage for calculation in the contract, O.C.G.A. § 13-1-11(a) provides a definition of reasonable. Id. While the Court would prefer to award exact fees based on the lodestar method, as a federal court sitting in diversity, the Court will apply Georgia substantive law. Lopez v. Target Corp., 676 F.3d 1230, 1235-36 (11th Cir. 2012). O.C.G.A. § 13-1-11 states that if a note Defendants. ORDER On February 6, 2014, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of First Chatham Bank on a claim of breach of a promissory note contract. ECF No. 24. The Court requested clarification on the damages calculation, including explicit accounting on the application of settlement funds from an additional former defendant. Id. at 2. Plaintiff has provided the Court with a satisfactory accounting, ECF No. 25. The accounting shows a total outstanding balance on the accounts of $441,748.73. ECF Nos. 25-1 at 5-6; 25-2 at 2; 25-3 at 2. This includes the application of a $125,000 settlement with former defendant Chris Lawson. ECF No. 25-2 at 8. The Plaintiff also claims attorney's fees pursuant to the promissory note contract. The Plaintiff initially requested exactly 15% of the total outstanding balance, ECF No. 25 at 1, but has since amended its request to align with Georgia statute. ECF No. 27 at 2. The notes at issue here contain conflicting language on whether reasonable attorney's fees should be awarded or a fixed 15% should be awarded for provides for the payment of reasonable attorney's fees without specifying any specific percent, such provision shall be construed to mean 15 percent of the first $500.00 of principal and interest owing on such note or other evidence of indebtedness and 10 percent of the amount of principal and interest owing thereon in excess of $500.00. The calculation of attorney's fees pursuant to this statute, given an outstanding balance of is $441,748.73, ($500.00 x 15%) + (($441,748.73 - $500.00) x 10%) = $44,199.88. Adding this amount to the principal, the total award shall be $485,948.61,' and the Court ORDERS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff for this amount. This ay of March 2014. B' AV7NT E1DENFIELD, YDGE 7 UNITED STATES DIST*CT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Plaintiff has a small discrepancy in its brief, ECF No. 27 at 3, because it completes its calculation with 8441,748.33 as the balance on the notes.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?