Hilton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER denying the construed motion for reconsideration in the 20 Response filed by Gregory Maverick Hilton. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/31/14. (wwp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
GREGORY MAVERICK HILTON,
Plaintiff,
V.
)
CAROLYN W COLVIN,
Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration,
CASE NO. CV413-145
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Gregory Maverick
Hilton's Response (Doc. 20) to this Court's Order (Doc. 18)
adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 15) and dismissing his case without prejudice. In
its previous order, the Court adopted the Report and
Recommendation because "Plaintiff did not adequately
articulate how he became disabled." (Doc. 18 at 1.) In
this response, Plaintiff states that the "following
information is the best that I can offer the court to
articulate how I became disabled." (Doc. 20 at 1.)
Because the Court has previously dismissed this case,
the Court will construe Plaintiff's response as a Motion
for Reconsideration. After carefully reviewing Plaintiff's
motion, however, the Court can find no reason to disturb
its prior order. While Plaintiff states that he was struck
on the head during the course of a robbery and suffers both
difficulty concentrating and short term memory loss (id. at
4) , he offers no information as to how this has rendered
him disabled. Moreover, Plaintiff maintains that he was
given a valid medical certificate and continued his
employment. (Id.) In short, consideration of the
information provided by Plaintiff in his response would not
serve to alter this Court's conclusion concerning the
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,
Plaintiff's construed Motion for Reconsideration must be
DENIED.
37'
SO ORDERED this .'V day of March 2014.
WILLIAM T. MOORE , 'JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?