Bartley v. United States of America
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations dismissing the case, denying 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Ernest A. Bartley, denying 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ernest A. Bartley, dismissing as moot 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Ernest A. Bartley. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/28/14. (wwp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
ERNEST ANTONIO BARTLEY,
Petitioner,
CASE NOS. CV413-249
CR412-015
V.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' (Doc.
2.) After a careful de novo review of the record, the report
and recommendation
is ADOPTED as
the Court's opinion in this
case. As a result, Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Petition is
DISMISSED.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED this
20day
of March 2014.
WILLIAM T. MOORE, J
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
1
This Court twice granted Petitioner's request for additional
time to file his objections, which were originally due on
December 16, 2013. (Doc. 5; Doc. 7.) In its last order, the
Court warned Petitioner that it was very unlikely to grant any
additional extensions. (Doc. 7 at 1-2.) Undeterred, Petitioner
twice requested the Clerk of Court grant him an additional
sixty-day extension. (Doc. 8; Doc. 10.) These motions are
DENIED: Petitioner had almost three full months to file his
objections, but failed to do so. Petitioner's Motion for Leave
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 9) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?