Bartley v. United States of America

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations dismissing the case, denying 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Ernest A. Bartley, denying 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ernest A. Bartley, dismissing as moot 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Ernest A. Bartley. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/28/14. (wwp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION ERNEST ANTONIO BARTLEY, Petitioner, CASE NOS. CV413-249 CR412-015 V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed.' (Doc. 2.) After a careful de novo review of the record, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. As a result, Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Petition is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED this 20day of March 2014. WILLIAM T. MOORE, J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 1 This Court twice granted Petitioner's request for additional time to file his objections, which were originally due on December 16, 2013. (Doc. 5; Doc. 7.) In its last order, the Court warned Petitioner that it was very unlikely to grant any additional extensions. (Doc. 7 at 1-2.) Undeterred, Petitioner twice requested the Clerk of Court grant him an additional sixty-day extension. (Doc. 8; Doc. 10.) These motions are DENIED: Petitioner had almost three full months to file his objections, but failed to do so. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 9) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?