Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Ratchford
Filing
34
ORDER dismissing as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; dismissing as moot 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing as moot 28 Motion to Strike; APPROVING re 33 Stipulation of Dismissal. Plaintiff's claims against defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/6/2015. (loh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
U
FILED
DIST RICT COURT
IiW( -b lOIS
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., as Trustee)
for the registered holders of
LaSalle Commercial Mortgage
Securities Trust 2006-MF4,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificate Series 2006-MF4,,
CLERK-
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. CV414-067
V.
WARREN E. RATCHFORD,
)
Defendant.
ORDER
Before the Court is the parties Stipulation of Dismissal With
Prejudice. (Doc. 33.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a) (1) (A) (ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing "a
stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared."
As requested, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are
DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. Each party in this action shall bear its own costs
and attorney fees. As a result of dismissal, Plaintiff's Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 16), Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 19), and Motion to Strike (Doc. 28) are DISMISSED AS
MOOT. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED this
day of May 2015.
6~
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?