Branch Banking & Trust Company v. C & C Sports, Inc. et al
Filing
12
ORDER and Judgment granting 11 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 2/27/15. (bcw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO.,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. CV414-091
V.
C&C SPORTS, INC. and DAVID C.
ROLISON,
Defendants.)
-
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion forJJJefauTh
Judgment Against Defendant C&C Sports, Inc. (D c. 11.)
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant C&C Sports
and Defendant David C. Rolison on May 8, 2014. (Doc. 1.)
Defendant C&C Sports was served with a summons and copy of
the complaint on July 7, 2014. (Doc. 8 at 1.) After
Defendant C&C Sports failed to answer the complaint,
default was entered against it on August 14, 2014. (Doc.
10.) Plaintiff filed its Motion for Default Judgment on
August 25, 2014, requesting the entry of a default judgment
against Defendant C&C Sports pursuant to Rule 55 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant C&C Sports,
who is not subject to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act,
50 U.S.C. App. H 501-596, have failed to respond to both
Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Motion for
Default Judgment.
After careful consideration, Plaintiff's Motion is
GRANTED and judgment is hereby rendered in favor of
Plaintiff Branch Banking & Trust Company, and against
Defendant C&C Sports in the total amount of $176,776.34.
This amount represents $14,099.22 in principal; $611.35 in
interest; and $1,496.45 in attorney's fees pursuant to
O.C.G.A. § 13-1-11 with respect to Note-1; and $139,283.17
in principal; $6,446.17 in interest; $242.05 in late fees;
and $14,597.93 in attorney's fees pursuant to O.C.G.A.
§ 13-1-11 with respect to Note-3.
SO ORDERED this
1'1
Z— day
of February 2015.
WILLIAM T. MOORE,.
UNITED STATES DIS'RICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
01
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?