Bradley v. Tucker et al
Filing
32
ORDER awarding Officer Christopher Tucker $1,500 in sanctions against Mr. Nicholas Pagano payable to Defendant's counsel within thirty (30) days of this Order. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/10/2015. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
ALBERT BRADLEY,
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
*
CV 414-165
*
CHRISTOPHER TUCKER,
in his
*
personal capacity, and JOHN AND
*
JANE DOES 1-20,
*
*
Defendants.
*
ORDER
By
Order
Rule 11
dated
sanctions
Pagano.
(Doc.
claims
advanced
frivolous
and
July
were
30.)
(2)
1,
2015,
appropriate
Specifically,
pertaining
Mr.
this
to
Pagano
Court
against
the
Court
Officer
failed to
attorney
found
Tucker
make
determined
a
Nicholas
that
were
that
(1)
the
objectively
reasonable
inquiry
into the merit of his client's purported cause of action.
Having
attention
Pagano.
to
the
amount
liability,
of
"The imposition of
reasonable
v.
established
Clark,
use
819
of
a
court's
F.2d 1551,
sanctions
the
to
Court
be
now
assessed
a monetary sanction is
discretion
1557
under
(11th Cir.
Rule
1987).
turns
its
against
Mr.
a particularly
11."
Donaldson
"District
courts
are vested with broad discretion to fashion an appropriate sanction
for violations of Rule ll."
F.R.D.
155,
160
(S.D.
Ga.
Mike Ousley Prods.,
1990).
Defense
Inc. v.
counsel
Cabot,
has
130
filed
documentation setting forth the fees and expenses incurred in this
matter,
which total $11,239.78.
(Doc. 31-1.)
The Court limits the
sanction to an amount that the Court believes necessary to achieve
the
purposes
of
Rule
11.
Therefore,
the
Court
HEREBY
AWARDS
Officer Christopher Tucker $1,500 in sanctions against Mr. Nicholas
Pagano payable
to
Defendant's
counsel
within THIRTY
(30)
DAYS
of
this Order.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this
/ffi^fc&day of August,
2015.
HONAE^CB^J. RANDAL HALL
united/states DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUIJIfiRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?