Bradley v. Tucker et al

Filing 32

ORDER awarding Officer Christopher Tucker $1,500 in sanctions against Mr. Nicholas Pagano payable to Defendant's counsel within thirty (30) days of this Order. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/10/2015. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION ALBERT BRADLEY, * Plaintiff, * v. * CV 414-165 * CHRISTOPHER TUCKER, in his * personal capacity, and JOHN AND * JANE DOES 1-20, * * Defendants. * ORDER By Order Rule 11 dated sanctions Pagano. (Doc. claims advanced frivolous and July were 30.) (2) 1, 2015, appropriate Specifically, pertaining Mr. this to Pagano Court against the Court Officer failed to attorney found Tucker make determined a Nicholas that were that (1) the objectively reasonable inquiry into the merit of his client's purported cause of action. Having attention Pagano. to the amount liability, of "The imposition of reasonable v. established Clark, use 819 of a court's F.2d 1551, sanctions the to Court be now assessed a monetary sanction is discretion 1557 under (11th Cir. Rule 1987). turns its against Mr. a particularly 11." Donaldson "District courts are vested with broad discretion to fashion an appropriate sanction for violations of Rule ll." F.R.D. 155, 160 (S.D. Ga. Mike Ousley Prods., 1990). Defense Inc. v. counsel Cabot, has 130 filed documentation setting forth the fees and expenses incurred in this matter, which total $11,239.78. (Doc. 31-1.) The Court limits the sanction to an amount that the Court believes necessary to achieve the purposes of Rule 11. Therefore, the Court HEREBY AWARDS Officer Christopher Tucker $1,500 in sanctions against Mr. Nicholas Pagano payable to Defendant's counsel within THIRTY (30) DAYS of this Order. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this /ffi^fc&day of August, 2015. HONAE^CB^J. RANDAL HALL united/states DISTRICT JUDGE SOUIJIfiRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?