Lang v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER denying 43 Motion for Reconsideration re 41 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, 42 Clerk's Judgment; denying 46 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 46 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; dismissing as moot re 49 Motion to Dismiss. (loh)

FILED
U. S. OIS1TlCT COURT
SAVAAH DIV.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION

JAPR 13 AM 8: 59

EDWARD V. LANG,
Plaintiff,
V

CASE NO. CV414-196

.

BLOOMIN' BRANDS, INC., and
OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE,
Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration
(Doc. 43) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 46). 1 Plaintiff has
filed the above motions pro Se. As this Court has previously
stated, it does not consider pro se motions from represented
parties. 2 (Dcc. 38.) Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motions are DENIED.
SO ORDERED this L... day of April 2016.

WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR.L'
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

1

Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Dismiss which appears to be the
same document filed with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
(Doc 49.) Because the Eleventh Circuit granted Plaintiff's motion,
Plaintiff's filing with this Court is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
2
See S.D. Ga. L.R. 83.6(d) ("Whenever a party has appeared by
attorney, he may not thereafter appear or act in his own behalf in
the action or proceeding, or take any step therein, unless an order
of substitution shall first have been made by the Court. . .
United States v. Morris, 389 F. App'x 948, 951 (11th Cir. 2010)
(stressing
defendants
are
"unentitled
to
hybrid
that
representation")