Bradley, Jr. v. United States of America

Filing 6

ORDER: The Court VACATES the stay. Within 14 days of the date this Order is served, the father shall brief the Court on any claims that remain in his § 2255 motion. The United States will have 14 days to reply. Movants failure to comply may result in dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and L.R. 41.1(b). (Compliance due by 4/27/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/13/17. (jlm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION MARTIN J. BRADLEY, Jr., Movant, v. CV414-198 CR405-059 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER In 2014, Martin Bradley, Jr. filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction for racketeering, money laundering, and failure to disclose a foreign financial interest. Doc. 553; docs. 1531 & 1532 (double entry). His son, Martin Bradley, III also was convicted in the same scheme and had filed a § 2255 motion the year before. Doc. 553; doc. 1494. The district court denied the son’s motion, and he appealed. Bradley v. United States , No. 4: 13-CV-121, 2013 WL 6246775, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2013), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 2017 WL 237581 (11th Cir. Jan. 19, 2017) ( Bradley ). The father had adopted his son’s § 2255 motion as his own (docs. 1494, 1531 & 1532), so this Court stayed the father’s case until Bradley’s resolution. Doc. 1536. 1 The Eleventh Circuit in part affirmed and in part reversed the district judge’s ruling. Bradley , 2017 WL 237581 at *10 (11th Cir. Jan. 19, 2017); doc. 1550 (mandate). Therefore, the Court VACATES the stay. Doc. 1536. Within 14 days of the date this Order is served, the father shall brief the Court on any claims that remain in his § 2255 motion. The United States will have 14 days to reply. Movant’s failure to comply may result in dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and L.R. 41.1(b). SO ORDERED , this 13th day of April, 2017. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?