Briggs II v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER awarding the requested $4,403.47 in attorneys' fees and $400 in costs re 19 Stipulation filed by Carolyn W. Colvin. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 8/3/16. (trb)

Download PDF
LEO U.S. C!STici COURT S P J .! A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 206AUG-3 AM 11: 26 SAVANNAH DIVISION LOUIS HINTZE BRIGGS, II, ) Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV415-062 V. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is the Parties Joint Stipulation for Resolution of Petition for EAJA Fees. (Doc. 19.) The Court has carefully considered the application for attorney's fees and costs and finds that Plaintiff meets the requirements set forth in Jean v. Nelson, 863 F.2d 759, 765 (11th Cit. 1988) (holding that to recover attorney's fees "(1) the litigant opposing the United States must be a prevailing party; (2) the government's position must not have been substantially justified; and (3) there must be no circumstances that make an award against the government unjust") . Accordingly, Plaintiff is AWARDED the requested $4,403.47 in attorneys' fees and $400 in costs. Upon the entry of this order, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program, 31 U.S.C. ยงยง 3711, 3716. If Plaintiff owes such a debt, the fee award will be applied towards its settlement and the Treasury Department should issue a check for the remaining funds made payable to Plaintiff and mail the check to Plaintiff's counsel. If Plaintiff does not owe such a debt, the government will accept the assignment of EAJA fees and pay such fees directly to Plaintiff's attorney. SO ORDERED this day of August 2016. WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?