Jones v. Tatum

Filing 28

ORDER denying any request for COA and dismissing as moot Petitioners' in forma pauperis status on appeal for the 24 Notice of Appeal filed by Robert Lee Jones. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 4/20/16. (wwp)

Download PDF
U.S. DCOURT Il C • nj J fl 4J . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGA.16 APR 2O PM 3:57 SAVANNAH DIVISION ILE ROBERT LEE JONES, ) Petitioner, V CASE NO. CV415-065 . CLAY TATUM, Warden, Respondent. ORDER This case was returned to this Court on a limited remand from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whether a Certificate of Appealability ('COA") is appropriate for any of the issues appellant seeks to raise on appeal. (Doc. 27 at 1.) While this Court has already determined that Petitioner is not entitled to a COA,' it will once again confirm that earlier ruling in an attempt to satisfy the Court of Appeals's directive. In this case, any request for a COA is DENIED because Petitioner has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Should the 1 appears that the Eleventh Circuit is under the misapprehension that when adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this Court 'made no ruling with respect to a COA." (Doc. 27 at I.) However, this Court adopted the totality of the report and recommendation (Doc. 22 at 1), which included the recommendation that no COA should issue (Doc. 15 at 7-8) Court of Appeals have any doubt, any request by Petitioner for in forma pauperis status on appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT based on this Court's denial of a COA. SO ORDERED this 2day of April 2016. WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?