LM Insurance Corporation v. Roof Crafters, Inc. et al
Filing
56
The Court ORDERS the parties to, within seven days of the date this Order is served, comply (finally) with the Courts previous extension 45 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, and submit a proposed scheduling order. That proposal will use January 1, 2016 as discoverys commencement and calculate remaining deadlines accordingly. ( Compliance due by 4/22/2016.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/14/16. (wwp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROOF CRAFTERS, INC. a/k/a
ROOFCRAFTERS, INC. and
DAVID OWENS,
Defendants.
ROOF CRAFTERS, INC., and DAVID
OWENS,
Case No. CV415-116
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
J.C.B. ROOFING LLC, J.C.B.
ROOFING-II, LLC, THOMAS
KREJCI and BOBBY MYERS,
Third-Party Defendants.
ORDER
Over five months ago in this contract dispute, the Court granted
defendants’ motion to join three third-party defendants. Doc. 28. It then
delayed the deadline for submitting a proposed scheduling order until
fourteen days after the last of the new defendants answered. Doc. 45.
That happened on November 30, 2015, see docs. 50 & 51, but the parties
never submitted the proposed scheduling order.
Instead, they filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) report on December 15,
2015 that requested discovery commence on January 1, 2016. Doc. 52.
They also noted that the “[u]nusually large number of parties [and]
[u]nusually large number of claims [and] defenses” justified a request for
additional discovery time. But they never said how much.
Hence, the Court ORDERS the parties to, within seven days of the
date this Order is served, comply (finally) with the Court’s previous
extension (doc. 45) and submit a proposed scheduling order. That
proposal will use January 1, 2016 as discovery’s commencement and
calculate remaining deadlines accordingly.
SO ORDERED , this 14th day of April, 2016.
LTh11ED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?