LM Insurance Corporation v. Roof Crafters, Inc. et al

Filing 56

The Court ORDERS the parties to, within seven days of the date this Order is served, comply (finally) with the Courts previous extension 45 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, and submit a proposed scheduling order. That proposal will use January 1, 2016 as discoverys commencement and calculate remaining deadlines accordingly. ( Compliance due by 4/22/2016.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/14/16. (wwp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION LM INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ROOF CRAFTERS, INC. a/k/a ROOFCRAFTERS, INC. and DAVID OWENS, Defendants. ROOF CRAFTERS, INC., and DAVID OWENS, Case No. CV415-116 Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. J.C.B. ROOFING LLC, J.C.B. ROOFING-II, LLC, THOMAS KREJCI and BOBBY MYERS, Third-Party Defendants. ORDER Over five months ago in this contract dispute, the Court granted defendants’ motion to join three third-party defendants. Doc. 28. It then delayed the deadline for submitting a proposed scheduling order until fourteen days after the last of the new defendants answered. Doc. 45. That happened on November 30, 2015, see docs. 50 & 51, but the parties never submitted the proposed scheduling order. Instead, they filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) report on December 15, 2015 that requested discovery commence on January 1, 2016. Doc. 52. They also noted that the “[u]nusually large number of parties [and] [u]nusually large number of claims [and] defenses” justified a request for additional discovery time. But they never said how much. Hence, the Court ORDERS the parties to, within seven days of the date this Order is served, comply (finally) with the Court’s previous extension (doc. 45) and submit a proposed scheduling order. That proposal will use January 1, 2016 as discovery’s commencement and calculate remaining deadlines accordingly. SO ORDERED , this 14th day of April, 2016. LTh11ED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?