Williams v. Waiters
Filing
21
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's claim pursuant to 42 USC § 1983. As the Court has disposed of all claims over which it had original jurisdiction, the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff& #039;s remaining state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Accordingly, Plaintiff's state law claims are REMANDED to the State Court of Chatham County. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/28/17. (jlm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
TIMOTHY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. CV415-118
V.
o
BOBBY WAITERS,
o
pf-!
cz
w
;SS»
Defendant.
:^>o
Cj"} -f-i
"f
Tl
7^ ZZ 1
V > o rn
ORDER
•«
Before
the
Court
is
Defendant's
Motion
for
IS>
Judgment.
(Doc.
13.)
For
the
following
reasons.
Defendant's
motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. As the Court has disposed of all claims over which it
had
original
jurisdiction
pursuant
state
to
law
jurisdiction,
over
28
Plaintiff's
U.S.C.
claims
the
are
Court
remaining
§ 1367(c)(3).
REMZVNDED
declines
to
the
to
state
law
Accordingly,
State
exercise
Court
claims
Plaintiff's
of
Chatham
County. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
BACKGROUND
In the early morning hours of April 10, 2013, Plaintiff and
three
companions
left
the
Island
Breeze
restaurant
and
club
after one of them had a verbal altercation. (Doc. 16, Attach. 16
at 15; id., Attach. 17 at 1.) While walking in the area, they
heard
a
series
of
gunshots
and
decided
to
run
away
to
seek
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?