Byrd et al v. Drive Electric, LLC et al

Filing 37

ORDERED that if the district judge denies the motion to dismiss, the parties shall present a proposed scheduling Order within 14 days after the denial order is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/17/16. (wwp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION RICHARD BYRD and AMANDA BYRD, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. CV415-120 DRIVE ELECTRIC, LLC et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court in this products liability case is the parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) report. Doc. 36. In it Suzhou Eagle Electric Vehicle Manufacturing (the only defendant to respond or appear) and plaintiffs illuminate several discovery issues: (1) whether to allow jurisdictional discovery; (2) how that discovery, if allowed, should proceed; and (3) how long a jurisdictional discovery period should last. See id. All three issues, however, inextricably intertwine with Suzhou’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction currently pending before the district judge. Doc. 28. Accordingly, the Court finds good cause to delay entry of a Scheduling Order, and a decision on how discovery should proceed, until after the district judge rules on Suzhou’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) (judges may delay entry of scheduling orders upon a finding of good cause). Should the district judge deny that motion, the parties shall present a proposed Scheduling Order within 14 days after the denial order is served. If the district judge allows for jurisdictional discovery before deciding the motion, the parties shall brief whether the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad, 28 U.S.C. § 1781, should govern such discovery. Suzhou’s Hague brief is due 14 days after a decision by the district judge to allow jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs’ Hague response brief is due 14 days after Suzhou’s. The parties also must submit a proposed scheduling order for jurisdictional discovery within 14 days of the district judge’s decision that accounts for the briefing schedule outlined above. SO ORDERED, this 17th day of February, 2016. •-r•/ ..- 7 •'/ UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?