Lofton v. Wiliams et al

Filing 14

ORDER directing the Clerk to forward a copy of plaintiff's complaint, motion to amend, report and recommendation and this Order to the USM for service on defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/15/16. (bcw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION SCOUTERRIOUS LOFTON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CV415-146 WARDEN STANLEY WILLIAMS; and CERT OFFICER SANTIAGO, Defendants. ORDER In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case, the Court recently adopted the undersigned’s recommendation that several of plaintiff Scouterrious Lofton’s claims be allowed to proceed (and that several others be dismissed). Doc. 13 (adopting doc. 10). Because Lofton proceeds in forma pauperis, service must be effected by the United States Marshal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of plaintiff’s complaint (doc. 1); his motion to amend (doc. 9); the undersigned’s preliminary review recommendation (doc. 10); and this Order to the Marshal for service upon all defendants. In most cases, the Marshal will first mail a copy of the complaint and its amendment to a defendant by first-class mail and request that each defendant waive formal service of the summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d); Local Rule 4.7. Defendants have a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and if they fail to comply with the waiver request, they must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). A within-district defendant who timely returns the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until thirty days after the date that the Marshal sent the request for waiver. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3). SO ORDERED , this 14th day of April, 2016. -fl-- -F LTh11ED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?