Coastal Logistics, Inc. v. AIM Steel International, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/21/2016. (maa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION COASTAL LOGISTICS, INC., * Plaintiff, * * AIM STEEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. CV 415-177 * * ORDER Before Default. the (Doc. with a copy of filed an (Docs. Court 28.) Plaintiff's Motion for 6.) to On Entry Plaintiff's August 19, complaint counsel on for 30, July 2015 and 15, Defendant 2015. filed motion to withdraw from this case as counsel of record.1 On 25.) September of The record shows that Defendant was served the summons and complaint on June answer 5, is 12, 2016, the Court granted (Doc. counsel Defendant's motion to withdraw and directed Defendant a for "to retain new counsel and to have new counsel file a notice of appearance in this hereof (Doc. case [i.e., 27.) by by close of close business of In its Order, within business on fourteen September (14) 26, days 2016]." the Court warned Defendant that, as a corporate entity unrepresented by counsel, its failure to timely obtain substitute counsel "may result in 1 Counsel for Defendant provided the requisite withdraw as counsel of record on August 4, 2016. LR 83.7, SDGa. the entry of default notice of its intent to (See Doc. 25-1); see also against [Defendant] ." Plaintiff filed its present Motion November 1, not (Doc. of for Entry of Default. On by no later than November 15, 2016, why the Court strike 29.) Order On September 28, 2016, 2016, the Court entered an Order directing Defendant to show cause, should (Doc. 27, at 2.) To its answer date, November and Defendant 1, 2016 enter has and/or default failed to have to against respond new counsel it. to the enter a notice of appearance in this case. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f), issue "any just orders, including those 37 (b) (2) (A) (ii) - (vii) ," if a party "fails or other pretrial order." authorized to obey a by Rule scheduling Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f)(1)(C). Such Rule inter alia, 37 sanctions include, the Court may the Court "striking pleadings in whole or in part" and "rendering a default judgment against the disobedient party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) (2) (A) (iii) & (vi) . However, given the severity of this sanction, the Court should not order a default judgment unless the noncompliance is "due to willful or bad faith disregard for States v. 126 Certain Real F.3d 1314, 1317 Prop. [previous] Located at (11th Cir. 1997) orders." United Route 1, Bryant, (quoting Cox v. Ala., Am. Cast Iron Pipe Co., 784 F.2d 1546, 1156 (11th Cir. 1986)). At this time, Defendant's answer September 12, counsel and an 2016, have is entry of default appropriate. As and striking stated of above, on the Court ordered Defendant to retain new new counsel enter a notice of appearance by September 26, 2016. Upon Defendant's failure Plaintiff filed its Motion for Entry of Default, to do so, which in turn led to the Court's Order directing the Defendant to show cause why its answer should not be stricken or defaulted entered against it. Since then, Defendant has failed to respond to the Court's cause or show order otherwise notice of appearance on its behalf. ample notice inaction, its of these obligations noncompliance have new counsel enter a Because Defendant received and the exemplifies consequences the willful of its disregard that warrants the severe sanction of the striking of its answer and the entry of default against it.2 Upon the foregoing, (doc. to 28) is GRANTED STRIKE IN PART and the Defendant's against Defendant. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default answer (doc. identify default Nat'l Within the bases judgment. Bank, 515 6) and Court to is DIRECTED ENTER DEFAULT Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file its motion for default judgment within thirty (30) default. Clerk of its in motion, days of the Clerk's entry of Plaintiff the pleadings that shall support See Nishimatsu Constr. F.2d 1200, 1206 (5th Co., specifically the Ltd. Cir. grant v. 1975) of Houston (W[A] 2 While Plaintiff's motion is titled as a "Motion for Entry of Default," Plaintiff appears to be requesting the entry of default judgment against Defendant. (Doc. 28, at 2.) A default judgment and an entry of default are not identical procedural devices. An entry of default is a prerequisite to obtaining a default judgment. See 10A Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure ยง 2682 (3d ed. 1998) ("Prior to obtaining a default judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a)."). Because Plaintiff has not yet received an entry of default, any request by Plaintiff for the entry of a default judgment against Defendant is premature. 3 defendant's default does not in itself warrant the court in entering a default judgment. There must be a sufficient basis in the pleadings for the judgment entered.") Plaintiff shall also include all supporting documentation and affidavits establishing the amount of Plaintiff's damages. Ass'n v. See Wells Fargo Bank, Columbia Hardwoods & Floors, WL 85243, at plaintiff1s certain, *3 (S.D. Ga. claim against the law Jan. a requires evidentiary hearing to 7, Inc., 2013) defaulting the No. CV 112-004, ("Ordinarily, defendant district fix the amount of Nat'l court damages. is 2013 unless a for a sum hold an However, no to hearing is needed when the district court already has a wealth of evidence from the party requesting the hearing, additional evidence would be truly informed determination of damages." F.3d 1225, 1231, 1232 n.13 (11th Cir. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, November, unnecessary such that any to a fully (citing S.E.C. v. Smyth, 420 2005))). Georgia, this J2J day of 2016. HALL UNITEp/STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?