Vallambrosa Plantation, LLC et al v. Sikorsky et al

Filing 52

ORDER dismissing as moot 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 47 Motion to Remand to State Court; dismissing as moot re 48 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to 42 Notice of Motion Issued, 41 First MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/8/17. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA s ......;i Div '"'n pj, o. ri SAVANNAH DIVISION ot r- VALLAMBROSA PLANTATION, LLC; JERRY WILLIAMS; and TAMMY LEE WILLIAMS, CASE NO. CV415-202 Plaintiff, V, DAVID SIKORSKY and MARY SIKORSKY; Defendants. ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint and to Add a Party (Doc. 46) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 47). Plaintiffs request that the Court allow Plaintiffs to amend their complaint to drop the racketeering charge against Defendants and to add an (Doc. 46 at 2.) Pursuant to additional party-Peter Sikorsky. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), a court may grant permission to amend a complaint "when justice so requires." Defendants have no objection to Plaintiffs' request to drop the racketeering charge. (Doc. 50 at 1.) However, Defendants have objected to the addition of Mr. Sikorsky. (Id.) After a review of the record, Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend (Doc. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiffs may amend their complaint to remove the racketeering charge. Because this action deprives this Court of jurisdiction, the Court DECLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?