Holtzclaw v. Morales et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 Affidavit, 34 Objection to Report and Recommendations filed by Loyd W. Holtzclaw. The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation on February 27, 2017. (Doc. 32. ) However, the Court will construe Plaintiff's objection and af fidavit as requests for reconsideration and review the report and recommendation in light of these objections. After a careful de novo review of the record and Plaintiff's objections, the Court sees no reason to disturb its prior order adopting the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request is DENIED. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/19/17. (jlm)

* ■-' p t f

^/ "' '
'

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

-

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
LOYD W.

{g Pf| 03
' *

HOLTZCLAW,

Plaintiff,
CASE NO.

V,

WARDEN

JOSE MORALES

JACKSON,

CV416-068

and MR.

Unit Manager,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before
Report
March

and
6,

which was
be

the

2017,

and

to

the

affidavit

After

Plaintiff's

the

2017.

Recommendation

report

and
a

as

Court

(Doc.

prior

for

order

Judge's

novo

the

filed
(Doc.

These documents

on
35)

appear to

February

1,

to which were

27,

2017.

Plaintiff's

reconsideration

in

was

to

2017

due by

The Court adopted that Report

construe

recommendation
de

which

objections

February

will

Objection

Second Affidavit

2017.

31. )

on

requests

careful

34)

Magistrate

Plaintiff's objections,
its

(Doc.

and recommendation,

However,

Plaintiff's

filed on May 18,

February 15,
and

is

Recommendation

objections

report

Court

light
review

of
of

(Doc.

objection and

and

these
the

32. )

review

the

objections.
record

and

the Court sees no reason to disturb

adopting

the

report

and

recommendation

of