Ray Capital Inc et al v. M/V Newlead Castellano et al
Filing
75
ORDER OF CONFIRMATION OF SALE as outlined in the body of this Order and including instructions to the United States Marshal and the Clerk of Court, etc. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 8/16/2016. (jah)
IN THE
UNITED
FOR THE
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
IN ADMIRALTY
RAY CAPITAL INC.;
OPPENHEIM
*
CAPITAL LTD.; CHEYENNE HOLDINGS *
LTD.; and LABROY SHIPTRADE
*
LIMITED,
*
*
Plaintiffs,
*
v.
*
M/V NEWLEAD CASTELLANO, IMO NO.
9686338, her engines, tackle,
equipment, furniture,
appurtenances, etc., in rem,
*
*
*
*
and NEWLEAD CASTELLANO LTD.,
CV 416-093
*
•
Defendants.
*
ORDER
The
Court,
pleadings,
prior
before the Court,
sitting
in
orders,
findings
complaint,
warrant
furniture,
other
considered
the
matters
properly
2016,
Plaintiffs'
verified
BACKGROUND
upon the filing of
the Court entered orders directing the issuance of a
for
CASTELLANO,
and
having
rules as follows:
I,
On April 19,
admiralty,
the
maritime
IMO
NO.
9686338,
appurtenances,
issuance of
process
the Vessel.
(Docs.
arrest
her
etc.,
for maritime
1,
8,
of
the
Defendant
engines,
in
rem
tackle,
("Vessel")/
attachment
and 10.)
M/V
On May
NEWLEAD
equipment,
and
the
and garnishment of
3,
2 016,
Defendant
NewLead
Castellano
attachment
Court
of
Ltd.
the
filed a
Vessel.
Motion
(Doc.
entered an order vacating
to Vacate
15.)
the
the
arrest
and
2016,
the
the Vessel,
but
On July
arrest
of
14,
denying the vacatur of the attachment of the Vessel.
On
August
15,
2 016,
Reconsideration
(Doc.
49.)
seeking to
On August 4,
of the Vessel.
On
May
July
United
(Doc.
26,
inter alia,
On
reinstate
2016,
the
the
Marshal
Division
an
Emergency
the arrest
of
Motion
the Vessel.
Plaintiff
Court
for
filed
of
entered
the
the
("Marshal")
to
motion
Vessel.
an
Southern
a
order
subsequently
August 4, 2016,
amended
Doc.
65
in
part
by
(as amended,
the
an
of
the
being
Vessel
incurred
deteriorating
creditors);
crew
was
to
(Doc. 48.)
to
its
and
prevent
warranted because
keep
value
(2)
the
as
the
interlocutory
Court's
(1)
Vessel
for
the
and
Order
dated
other
As
great
expense
seaworthy
(thereby
Plaintiff
and other
limited tools available
corrosion
(Doc. 48,
the interlocutory sale
of:
collateral
the
Georgia,
the "Order for Sale").)
set forth in the Court's Order for Sale,
of
28.)
directing
District
conduct
seeking,
(Doc.
admiralty sale of the Vessel on Monday August 8, 2 016.
as
for
the Court reinstated the arrest
interlocutory sale
2016,
States
filed
64.)
2016,
the
14,
Savannah
Plaintiffs
(Doc. 47.)
physical
to the Vessel's
deterioration.
See Fed. R. Civ. P., Supp. Adm. R. E(9)(a).
Notice
of the sale of the Vessel was duly published by
the Marshal pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 4.
August
8,
2016 at
10:00 a.m.,
the sale of
(Doc.
70.)
On
the Vessel was duly
conducted in accordance with the Court's Order for Sale by the
Marshal
at
District
the
premises
Court,
Strategic
Savannah,
Shipping,
$7,400,000.00 USD
gas
oil
delivery
Price")
auction.
the
the
entrance
Georgia.
Inc.
to
(Doc.
("Strategic")
the
70.)
United
At
presented
States
the
a
sale,
bid
of
(plus the current market price of any fuel or
remaining
to
of
on
board
successful
the
Vessel
bidder)
at
the
time
(collectively,
the
of
its
"Sale
and was the highest bidder capable of performing at the
(Doc.
66.)
On
August
8,
2016,
Strategic
presented
$1,000,000.00 USD to the Marshal as security for payment of the
remainder of its bid.
On August 11, 2016, Strategic made a wire
transfer
to
of
USD
be
to
the
applied
confirmation of
2016,
Clerk
Court
towards
in
its
the
bid
amount
of
upon
the sale held on August 8, 2 016.
$6,400,000.00
the
successful
On August 9,
Plaintiffs requested a hearing to confirm the sale of
Vessel to Strategic.
(Doc.
68.)
the
II.
DISCUSSION
A. The Order for Sale has been obeyed and the Sale Price is
not grossly inadequate.
Until confirmation,
any
time,
Ghezzi v.
but
extreme
a sale in admiralty may be set aside at
caution
should be
Foss Launch & Tug Co.,
used
in
321 F.2d 421
such actions.
(9th Cir.
1963) .
The grounds recognized as justifying setting aside an admiralty
sale
include
fraud,
collusion,
and
gross
Wong Shing v. M/V Mardina Trader,
564
(citing 2 C.J.S.
Admiralty
§ 247
(1972)).
allegations
evidence
of
inadequacy of
or
interlocutory
sale
of
the
F.2d 1183
fraud
Vessel
and
(5th Cir.
Here,
or
the
1977)
there are no
collusion
so
price.
Court
in
the
need
only
determine if the Order for Sale was obeyed and if the Sale Price
was not grossly inadequate.
The
Order
publication
of
for
the
Sale
required
notice
Local Admiralty Rule 4.
of
the
Plaintiffs
auction
(Doc. 48, at 2.)
in
to
Order
for
Sale
further
independent ship brokers,
and Jacq.
Plaintiffs have filed
at
Plaintiffs
Compass Maritime,
with
Inc.,
to
of
(Doc.
70.)
appoint
two
New Jersey
Pierot Jr. & Sons of New York to value the Vessel (the
"Valuations")
48,
required
the
accordance
proof of publication of such notice with the Court.
The
cause
2-3.)
and to file such valuations with the Court.
(Doc.
Plaintiffs have obtained and filed the Valuations
with the Court.
(Doc.
61.)
The Court
further ordered that the
opening
bid
for
seventy-five
the
(75%)
(Doc. 48, at 3.)
Vessel
should
percent
of
be
by
the
Marshal
average
the
set
at
of
the
Valuations.
The Valuations provided estimated fair market
values of $7,250,000.00 USD and $7,000,000.00 USD, respectively.
(Docs.
61-1
and
61-2.)
Seventy-five
average
of
these
Bid").
The Marshal has filed a Marshal's Report of Sale which
figures
is
(75%)
$5,343,750.00
percent
USD
(the
of
the
"Minimum
shows that the Sale Price was greater than the Minimum Bid and
exceeded
further
sale.
cost
the
recommended
(Id.)
of
highest
that
the
(Doc.
Court
Strategic has paid the
the
fuel
until physical
or gas
oil
66.)
approve
$1,000,000.00
security by the Marshal,
the
been obeyed and that
and confirms
the
Court
finds
that
the Sale Price
sale of
and
Sale Price,
the Vessel
is
to
Marshal
confirm
has
this
except for the
be
calculated
presented to
and
into the registry of
See Docket Entry dated August 11,
Accordingly,
The
aboard which cannot
delivery and the
presently held as
the Court.
Valuation.
the
2016.
Order
of
Sale
has
not grossly inadequate,
Strategic
for the
Sale
Price.
B. Local Admiralty Rule 15 limits claims made after the date
of sale.
Pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 15, additional claims upon
the
proceeds
of
sale
from
the
Vessel
shall
be
limited
to
remnants and surplus remaining after distribution to lienors who
filed
their
otherwise
claims
before
ordered.
This
date of the sale of
the
sale
requires
of
the
the
Court
Vessel,
to
determine
by
First
National
Lightning Power,
the
Fifth
776
Circuit
Bank
F.2d 1258
described
auction sale in the
of
Id.
to
at
the
the
1261.
not
v.
M/V
In this case,
of
"The bid at
an
admiralty
the Marshal's
It is the equivalent of an
accepted until
judicially confirmed."
The auction held August 8, 2016 therefore was an
offer to purchase the Vessel,
Instead,
the Court is
Parish
1985).
confirmation
following terms:
court,
Jefferson
(5th Cir.
auction does not consummate a sale.
offer
the
the Vessel.
In determining the date of sale of the Vessel,
guided
unless
not the actual sale of the Vessel.
the actual sale of the Vessel does not occur until,
if, the sale is confirmed by the Court.
and
In light of the Court's
finding herein that the sale of the Vessel for the Sale Price is
confirmed,
claims
the
made
sale
after
date
this
of
the Vessel
Order
is
is
entered
the
date
shall
be
hereof,
and
treated
in
accordance with Local Admiralty Rule 15.
C. The
Vessel
is
sold
free
and
clear
of
liens
and
encumbrances.
The
Court,
having
accepted
the
Sale
Price having been received by the Court
the
fuel
physical
or
gas
delivery
oil
and
aboard
the
which
and
the
Sale
(except for the cost of
cannot
$1,000,000.00
Price,
be
USD
calculated
presented
until
to
and
presently held as
deliver
the
security by
Vessel
to
the Marshal) , has
Strategic
free
and
the
clear
of
power
all
to
liens,
encumbrances or claims against the Vessel pursuant to 46 U.S.C.
§ 31326.
The Vessel was sold pursuant to the Court's Order for
Sale, which was entered in this in rem action brought to enforce
preferred mortgage
liens.
(Doc. 48.)
Accordingly,
any claims
in the Vessel existing on the date hereof are terminated and the
Vessel
is
sold
free
of
such
claims
pursuant
to
46
U.S.C.
§
31326(a).
Those claims terminated pursuant to this Order shall attach
in the
same
amount
the
proceeds
and
shall
U.S.C.
and
with
of
the
sale as provided in
have
the
priority
§ 31326(b)(1)
NOW THEREFORE,
(1)
in accordance
and
established
46
their priorities
U.S.C.
under
furniture,
IMO
§ 31326(b),
subsections
46
(2).
it is hereby ORDERED:
That the interlocutory sale of the Vessel,
CASTELLANO,
to
NO.
9686338,
appurtenances,
her
etc.,
engines,
and
all
tackle,
M/V NEWLEAD
equipment,
necessaries
thereto
appertaining,
to Strategic for the Sale Price, plus the current
market
of
price
any
fuel
or
gas
oil
remaining
Vessel at the time of her delivery to Strategic,
on
board
the
free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances be and hereby is CONFIRMED.
(2)
That, pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 15, claims upon
the proceeds of sale of the Vessel,
except for seaman's wages,
shall be
limited to any remnants and surplus of
remaining after distribution to
before
the
(3)
date
lienors
who
the Sale Price
filed their claims
hereof.
That,
pursuant to 46 U.S.C.
§ 31326,
any claims in the
Vessel existing on the date hereof are terminated and the Vessel
is
sold
free
31326(a),
shall
of
but
attach
all
those
in
those
claims
the
same
claims
pursuant
terminated
amount
and
to
46
pursuant
U.S.C.
§
this
Order
accordance
in
to
with
their
priorities to the proceeds of the sale as provided in 46 U.S.C.
§
31326(b),
U.S.C.
§
and
shall
31326(b)(1)
have
and
the
(2),
priority
subject
to
established
further
under
order of
46
the
Court.
(4)
That
the
Marshal's bills of
of
the
Vessel
encumbrances
to
of
Marshal
three
(3)
duplicate
original
sale to Strategic transferring the ownership
Strategic,
any
kind
possession of the Vessel,
and acceptance,
issue
free
and
wherever
clear
they
of
may
all
be
evidenced by a protocol
to Strategic to occur no later
liens
held,
and
with
of delivery
than seven
(7)
days after the date hereof;
(5)
sale
to
That, upon the issuance of the aforementioned bills of
Strategic,
the
Marshal
and
the
court-appointed
substitute custodian are hereby relieved of any and all
duties
previously imposed by Order of this Court with respect to the
Vessel,
and are
ordered to
turn over possession,
custody,
and
control of the Vessel forthwith to Strategic.
(6)
That
the Marshal
shall
transfer
to
the
Clerk
of
Court
the funds remaining from the $1,000,000.00 USD presented to the
Marshal by Strategic as security for payment of the remainder of
its
bid,
less
any
costs
and/or
rules and customs of this Court.
expenses
The
allowable
under
the
Clerk shall deposit this
amount in the same interest-bearing account as the $6,400,000.00
USD received by the Court from Strategic on August 11, 2016.
ORDER ENTERED at Savannah,
August,
Georgia,
this _j[_6>_ day of
2016.
HONORABLE • . RANDAL HALL
J
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
JUDGE
SOUTJffiRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?