Ray Capital Inc et al v. M/V Newlead Castellano et al

Filing 75

ORDER OF CONFIRMATION OF SALE as outlined in the body of this Order and including instructions to the United States Marshal and the Clerk of Court, etc. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 8/16/2016. (jah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION IN ADMIRALTY RAY CAPITAL INC.; OPPENHEIM * CAPITAL LTD.; CHEYENNE HOLDINGS * LTD.; and LABROY SHIPTRADE * LIMITED, * * Plaintiffs, * v. * M/V NEWLEAD CASTELLANO, IMO NO. 9686338, her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem, * * * * and NEWLEAD CASTELLANO LTD., CV 416-093 * • Defendants. * ORDER The Court, pleadings, prior before the Court, sitting in orders, findings complaint, warrant furniture, other considered the matters properly 2016, Plaintiffs' verified BACKGROUND upon the filing of the Court entered orders directing the issuance of a for CASTELLANO, and having rules as follows: I, On April 19, admiralty, the maritime IMO NO. 9686338, appurtenances, issuance of process the Vessel. (Docs. arrest her etc., for maritime 1, 8, of the Defendant engines, in rem tackle, ("Vessel")/ attachment and 10.) M/V On May NEWLEAD equipment, and the and garnishment of 3, 2 016, Defendant NewLead Castellano attachment Court of Ltd. the filed a Vessel. Motion (Doc. entered an order vacating to Vacate 15.) the the arrest and 2016, the the Vessel, but On July arrest of 14, denying the vacatur of the attachment of the Vessel. On August 15, 2 016, Reconsideration (Doc. 49.) seeking to On August 4, of the Vessel. On May July United (Doc. 26, inter alia, On reinstate 2016, the the Marshal Division an Emergency the arrest of Motion the Vessel. Plaintiff Court for filed of entered the the ("Marshal") to motion Vessel. an Southern a order subsequently August 4, 2016, amended Doc. 65 in part by (as amended, the an of the being Vessel incurred deteriorating creditors); crew was to (Doc. 48.) to its and prevent warranted because keep value (2) the as the interlocutory Court's (1) Vessel for the and Order dated other As great expense seaworthy (thereby Plaintiff and other limited tools available corrosion (Doc. 48, the interlocutory sale of: collateral the Georgia, the "Order for Sale").) set forth in the Court's Order for Sale, of 28.) directing District conduct seeking, (Doc. admiralty sale of the Vessel on Monday August 8, 2 016. as for the Court reinstated the arrest interlocutory sale 2016, States filed 64.) 2016, the 14, Savannah Plaintiffs (Doc. 47.) physical to the Vessel's deterioration. See Fed. R. Civ. P., Supp. Adm. R. E(9)(a). Notice of the sale of the Vessel was duly published by the Marshal pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 4. August 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., the sale of (Doc. 70.) On the Vessel was duly conducted in accordance with the Court's Order for Sale by the Marshal at District the premises Court, Strategic Savannah, Shipping, $7,400,000.00 USD gas oil delivery Price") auction. the the entrance Georgia. Inc. to (Doc. ("Strategic") the 70.) United At presented States the a sale, bid of (plus the current market price of any fuel or remaining to of on board successful the Vessel bidder) at the time (collectively, the of its "Sale and was the highest bidder capable of performing at the (Doc. 66.) On August 8, 2016, Strategic presented $1,000,000.00 USD to the Marshal as security for payment of the remainder of its bid. On August 11, 2016, Strategic made a wire transfer to of USD be to the applied confirmation of 2016, Clerk Court towards in its the bid amount of upon the sale held on August 8, 2 016. $6,400,000.00 the successful On August 9, Plaintiffs requested a hearing to confirm the sale of Vessel to Strategic. (Doc. 68.) the II. DISCUSSION A. The Order for Sale has been obeyed and the Sale Price is not grossly inadequate. Until confirmation, any time, Ghezzi v. but extreme a sale in admiralty may be set aside at caution should be Foss Launch & Tug Co., used in 321 F.2d 421 such actions. (9th Cir. 1963) . The grounds recognized as justifying setting aside an admiralty sale include fraud, collusion, and gross Wong Shing v. M/V Mardina Trader, 564 (citing 2 C.J.S. Admiralty § 247 (1972)). allegations evidence of inadequacy of or interlocutory sale of the F.2d 1183 fraud Vessel and (5th Cir. Here, or the 1977) there are no collusion so price. Court in the need only determine if the Order for Sale was obeyed and if the Sale Price was not grossly inadequate. The Order publication of for the Sale required notice Local Admiralty Rule 4. of the Plaintiffs auction (Doc. 48, at 2.) in to Order for Sale further independent ship brokers, and Jacq. Plaintiffs have filed at Plaintiffs Compass Maritime, with Inc., to of (Doc. 70.) appoint two New Jersey Pierot Jr. & Sons of New York to value the Vessel (the "Valuations") 48, required the accordance proof of publication of such notice with the Court. The cause 2-3.) and to file such valuations with the Court. (Doc. Plaintiffs have obtained and filed the Valuations with the Court. (Doc. 61.) The Court further ordered that the opening bid for seventy-five the (75%) (Doc. 48, at 3.) Vessel should percent of be by the Marshal average the set at of the Valuations. The Valuations provided estimated fair market values of $7,250,000.00 USD and $7,000,000.00 USD, respectively. (Docs. 61-1 and 61-2.) Seventy-five average of these Bid"). The Marshal has filed a Marshal's Report of Sale which figures is (75%) $5,343,750.00 percent USD (the of the "Minimum shows that the Sale Price was greater than the Minimum Bid and exceeded further sale. cost the recommended (Id.) of highest that the (Doc. Court Strategic has paid the the fuel until physical or gas oil 66.) approve $1,000,000.00 security by the Marshal, the been obeyed and that and confirms the Court finds that the Sale Price sale of and Sale Price, the Vessel is to Marshal confirm has this except for the be calculated presented to and into the registry of See Docket Entry dated August 11, Accordingly, The aboard which cannot delivery and the presently held as the Court. Valuation. the 2016. Order of Sale has not grossly inadequate, Strategic for the Sale Price. B. Local Admiralty Rule 15 limits claims made after the date of sale. Pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 15, additional claims upon the proceeds of sale from the Vessel shall be limited to remnants and surplus remaining after distribution to lienors who filed their otherwise claims before ordered. This date of the sale of the sale requires of the the Court Vessel, to determine by First National Lightning Power, the Fifth 776 Circuit Bank F.2d 1258 described auction sale in the of Id. to at the the 1261. not v. M/V In this case, of "The bid at an admiralty the Marshal's It is the equivalent of an accepted until judicially confirmed." The auction held August 8, 2016 therefore was an offer to purchase the Vessel, Instead, the Court is Parish 1985). confirmation following terms: court, Jefferson (5th Cir. auction does not consummate a sale. offer the the Vessel. In determining the date of sale of the Vessel, guided unless not the actual sale of the Vessel. the actual sale of the Vessel does not occur until, if, the sale is confirmed by the Court. and In light of the Court's finding herein that the sale of the Vessel for the Sale Price is confirmed, claims the made sale after date this of the Vessel Order is is entered the date shall be hereof, and treated in accordance with Local Admiralty Rule 15. C. The Vessel is sold free and clear of liens and encumbrances. The Court, having accepted the Sale Price having been received by the Court the fuel physical or gas delivery oil and aboard the which and the Sale (except for the cost of cannot $1,000,000.00 Price, be USD calculated presented until to and presently held as deliver the security by Vessel to the Marshal) , has Strategic free and the clear of power all to liens, encumbrances or claims against the Vessel pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 31326. The Vessel was sold pursuant to the Court's Order for Sale, which was entered in this in rem action brought to enforce preferred mortgage liens. (Doc. 48.) Accordingly, any claims in the Vessel existing on the date hereof are terminated and the Vessel is sold free of such claims pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 31326(a). Those claims terminated pursuant to this Order shall attach in the same amount the proceeds and shall U.S.C. and with of the sale as provided in have the priority § 31326(b)(1) NOW THEREFORE, (1) in accordance and established 46 their priorities U.S.C. under furniture, IMO § 31326(b), subsections 46 (2). it is hereby ORDERED: That the interlocutory sale of the Vessel, CASTELLANO, to NO. 9686338, appurtenances, her etc., engines, and all tackle, M/V NEWLEAD equipment, necessaries thereto appertaining, to Strategic for the Sale Price, plus the current market of price any fuel or gas oil remaining Vessel at the time of her delivery to Strategic, on board the free and clear of all liens and encumbrances be and hereby is CONFIRMED. (2) That, pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 15, claims upon the proceeds of sale of the Vessel, except for seaman's wages, shall be limited to any remnants and surplus of remaining after distribution to before the (3) date lienors who the Sale Price filed their claims hereof. That, pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 31326, any claims in the Vessel existing on the date hereof are terminated and the Vessel is sold free 31326(a), shall of but attach all those in those claims the same claims pursuant terminated amount and to 46 pursuant U.S.C. § this Order accordance in to with their priorities to the proceeds of the sale as provided in 46 U.S.C. § 31326(b), U.S.C. § and shall 31326(b)(1) have and the (2), priority subject to established further under order of 46 the Court. (4) That the Marshal's bills of of the Vessel encumbrances to of Marshal three (3) duplicate original sale to Strategic transferring the ownership Strategic, any kind possession of the Vessel, and acceptance, issue free and wherever clear they of may all be evidenced by a protocol to Strategic to occur no later liens held, and with of delivery than seven (7) days after the date hereof; (5) sale to That, upon the issuance of the aforementioned bills of Strategic, the Marshal and the court-appointed substitute custodian are hereby relieved of any and all duties previously imposed by Order of this Court with respect to the Vessel, and are ordered to turn over possession, custody, and control of the Vessel forthwith to Strategic. (6) That the Marshal shall transfer to the Clerk of Court the funds remaining from the $1,000,000.00 USD presented to the Marshal by Strategic as security for payment of the remainder of its bid, less any costs and/or rules and customs of this Court. expenses The allowable under the Clerk shall deposit this amount in the same interest-bearing account as the $6,400,000.00 USD received by the Court from Strategic on August 11, 2016. ORDER ENTERED at Savannah, August, Georgia, this _j[_6>_ day of 2016. HONORABLE • . RANDAL HALL J UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTJffiRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?