Davis v. Olens et al
Filing
6
ORDER directing plaintiff to respond. (Compliance due by 2/5/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/6/17. (jlm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
GREG DAVIS,
c>!
Petitioner,
CV416-119
V.
'T3
SAMUEL S. OLENS;
Attorney General; JUDGE
MICHAEL L. KARPF,
t> i
C3
r*o
Respondents.
ORDER
Proceeding pro se, Greg Davis filed a "Motion Under Rule 60(b)(3)
Fraud." Doc. 1. But it had nothing to do with ginjdhing that's occurred
in this Court. Instead, it attacked what Davis seemed to say was a state
criminal court "competency judgment" against him. Id. at 4. The Clerk
docketed it as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Court accepted the
Clerk's designation for docket-keeping purposes but abstained from
judicially characterizing the filing as a § 2254 petition — until Davis
clarified what he sought. It directed the Clerk to send him specific forms
for filing both habeas £md civil rights cases, and gave him a deadline for
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?