Davis v. Olens et al

Filing 6

ORDER directing plaintiff to respond. (Compliance due by 2/5/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/6/17. (jlm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION

GREG DAVIS,
c>!

Petitioner,
CV416-119

V.

'T3

SAMUEL S. OLENS;
Attorney General; JUDGE
MICHAEL L. KARPF,

t> i
C3
r*o

Respondents.

ORDER

Proceeding pro se, Greg Davis filed a "Motion Under Rule 60(b)(3)
Fraud." Doc. 1. But it had nothing to do with ginjdhing that's occurred
in this Court. Instead, it attacked what Davis seemed to say was a state

criminal court "competency judgment" against him. Id. at 4. The Clerk
docketed it as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Court accepted the
Clerk's designation for docket-keeping purposes but abstained from

judicially characterizing the filing as a § 2254 petition — until Davis
clarified what he sought. It directed the Clerk to send him specific forms

for filing both habeas £md civil rights cases, and gave him a deadline for