Davis v. Olens et al

Filing 6

ORDER directing plaintiff to respond. (Compliance due by 2/5/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/6/17. (jlm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION GREG DAVIS, c>! Petitioner, CV416-119 V. 'T3 SAMUEL S. OLENS; Attorney General; JUDGE MICHAEL L. KARPF, t> i C3 r*o Respondents. ORDER Proceeding pro se, Greg Davis filed a "Motion Under Rule 60(b)(3) Fraud." Doc. 1. But it had nothing to do with ginjdhing that's occurred in this Court. Instead, it attacked what Davis seemed to say was a state criminal court "competency judgment" against him. Id. at 4. The Clerk docketed it as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The Court accepted the Clerk's designation for docket-keeping purposes but abstained from judicially characterizing the filing as a § 2254 petition — until Davis clarified what he sought. It directed the Clerk to send him specific forms for filing both habeas £md civil rights cases, and gave him a deadline for

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?