Reynolds v. United States of America
Filing
26
ORDER dismissing 23 Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. Rule 60(B). Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/18/19. (jrb)
ij.S.n'ST'Scf CO'iHf
DIV.
::;:jrL ir pk z:U2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FQ^
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
r.
tJ. Ui51. Ur GA.
SAVANNAH DIVISION
CEDRIC REYNOLDS,
Petitioner,
CASE NO. CV416-194
V.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
Before
the
Court
is
Petitioner's
Motion
for
Relief
from
Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). (Doc. 23.) In his
motion.
Petitioner
previous
December
requests
20,
2016,
that
this
judgment"
Circuit's ruling in United States
Court
based
revisit
on
the
"it's
Eleventh
v. Moss, 920 F.3d 752 (11th
Cir. 2019). (Doc. 23 at 1.) After careful review, the Court finds
that Petitioner's motion must be DISMISSED.
First, Petitioner has failed to provide any sufficient basis
to grant relief under Rule 60(b). In order to obtain relief
under
Rule
60(b),
^extraordinary
a
petitioner
circumstances'
must
justifying
be
able
"to
the
reopening
show
of
a
final judgment." Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 535, 125 S.
Ct. 2461, 2649, 162 L. Ed. 2d 480 (2015) (quoting Ackermann v.
United States, 340 U.S. 193, 199, 71 S. Ct. 209, 95 L. Ed. 207
(1950)). On
July 15, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit vacated its
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?