Reynolds v. United States of America

Filing 26

ORDER dismissing 23 Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. Rule 60(B). Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/18/19. (jrb)

ij.S.n'ST'Scf CO'iHf
DIV.

::;:jrL ir pk z:U2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FQ^
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

r.

tJ. Ui51. Ur GA.

SAVANNAH DIVISION

CEDRIC REYNOLDS,

Petitioner,
CASE NO. CV416-194

V.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

ORDER

Before

the

Court

is

Petitioner's

Motion

for

Relief

from

Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). (Doc. 23.) In his
motion.

Petitioner

previous

December

requests
20,

2016,

that

this

judgment"

Circuit's ruling in United States

Court
based

revisit

on

the

"it's

Eleventh

v. Moss, 920 F.3d 752 (11th

Cir. 2019). (Doc. 23 at 1.) After careful review, the Court finds
that Petitioner's motion must be DISMISSED.

First, Petitioner has failed to provide any sufficient basis
to grant relief under Rule 60(b). In order to obtain relief

under

Rule

60(b),

^extraordinary

a

petitioner

circumstances'

must

justifying

be

able

"to

the

reopening

show
of

a

final judgment." Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 535, 125 S.

Ct. 2461, 2649, 162 L. Ed. 2d 480 (2015) (quoting Ackermann v.
United States, 340 U.S. 193, 199, 71 S. Ct. 209, 95 L. Ed. 207

(1950)). On

July 15, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit vacated its