Anderson v. Colvin

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Remand. The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further action consistent with this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/23/2017. (ca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION JANET ANDERSON, Plaintiff, V. CV416-202 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ^ Acting Commissioner of Sociai Security, Defendant. ORDER The Commissioner's unopposed motion to remand pursuant to sentence four of section 405^) is GRANTED. Doc. 14; see 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) giving the Court the "power to enter, upon the pieadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Sociai Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing."). Upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge is instructed to re-evaiuate the medicai evidence of record inciuding the opinions ^ Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Sociai Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civii Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Coivin as the defendant in this suit of Drs. Frank Bynes Jr., William McRae, III, and Lee McGIII. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(c), 416.927(c). The AU will state the weight assigned to the opinions, cite adequate reasons for accepting or rejecting ail of the limitations contained within the opinions, and if necessary, obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony concerning the effect of all of Plaintiff's impairments on her ability to perform other work. Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 40S(g)for further action consistent with this Order, so ORDERED this 2.3>da/of R^aiy,2017. 'GODBEY WOOD,CHIEF JUDGE TD STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?