Anderson v. Colvin
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Remand. The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further action consistent with this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/23/2017. (ca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
JANET ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
V.
CV416-202
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ^ Acting
Commissioner of Sociai Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
The Commissioner's unopposed motion to remand pursuant
to sentence four of section 405^) is GRANTED. Doc. 14; see
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) giving the Court the "power to enter, upon
the pieadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming,
modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of
Sociai Security, with or without remanding the cause for a
rehearing.").
Upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge is instructed to
re-evaiuate the medicai evidence of record inciuding the opinions
^
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Sociai Security.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civii Procedure, Nancy A.
Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Coivin as
the defendant in this suit
of Drs. Frank Bynes Jr., William McRae, III, and Lee McGIII. See
20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(c), 416.927(c). The AU will state the
weight assigned to the opinions, cite adequate reasons for
accepting or rejecting ail of the limitations contained within the
opinions, and if necessary, obtain supplemental vocational expert
testimony concerning the effect of all of Plaintiff's impairments on
her ability to perform other work.
Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner is
REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 40S(g)for further action consistent with this Order,
so ORDERED this 2.3>da/of R^aiy,2017.
'GODBEY WOOD,CHIEF JUDGE
TD STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?