First Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Inc. v. Bacter Waste Solutions, LLC et al
Filing
28
ORDER dismissing 15 Motion to Appoint Receiver; dismissing 20 Motion for Default Judgment; dismissing 26 Motion to Appoint Receiver. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 6/19/17. (wwp)
I ,i
{,1
i'
r -', ,,:.'
;:,,
U . ! . l r i : : -... ; . r ' j : ,i
;.:'.,,..:,r:ijri
COI,'RT FOR
IN THE I.'NITED STAITES DISTRICT
TI{E SOUTHERNdrsrRrcr oF cEoRclfflJi:li lq
IHERN
sAvANlrFH DTVTSTON
ili ll:
+a,
E'IRSTCITIZENS BANK & TRUST
COMPANY,INC, ,
CASENO. CV416-3OO
BACTERWASTE SOIUTIONS/ LLC and
TYRE M. STONE,
ORDEB
Before
as
to
Defendants
's
P-laintiff
the
of
(Doc. 22)
for
not
rlaf:rrl
I
Circuit
2AI7 ,
regarding
Defauft
feeL
case is
Court
was
it
prudent
made
to
lacks
grant
--T-"-*l|-
cf earf
and
Doc. 26).
Eor
that
Tyre
t.he case as to
as to
-rArar^ani
it
20)
apprised
Defendant
Stone.
stayed
Judqment
(Doc.
(Doc. 15;
the
authority
Stone
to
enter
plainriff's
DISMISSED.
Plaintiff,
"even
the
Defendant
Defendant Stone,
p.cter
of
M.
that
Accord_ingly,
as to Defendant Stone is
i,r.lnmonl-
has
stayed
Defendant
Default
M Stone
Court
to
as
the
for
motions are DISMISSED.
t.he
bankruptcy
a result,
Because the
Motion
Receiver
Appoint
and subsequently
order
does
PLaintiff's
Plaintiff's
8,
a
(Doc. 22\ , es
Motion
to
reasonsr
February
ex.istence
is
Bacte-r l.daste and Tyre
Motions
foflowing
0n
any
Court
the
s
WaSre.
when
the Court
request
The
for
Eleventh
defenclants
are
I
siri
larlv
ha
ah+aF^.r
sirriared-
Midwest
ElecLs.
on
*2
(S. D.
Concrete
4,
Fla.
2015) ) .
intertwlned
doing
Mocion
for
22,
rhe
Waste in
this
DefauLt
DISMfSSED. Plaintift
appo:ntmenr
diversity.
1289,
Plaintiff
a
Nat'f
1291
Inc.,
of
2008
WL
Doc.
June
lJ-ability
1s
when
Cir.
1998)
1L337779,
onlv
It
Iiability.
beinq
would be
as
prohibited
Lo
from
De FenrJant' s
n,r- rr-
Defendant
rhis
Stamp
v.
(S.D. Ffa.
Accn-di
Eo
26. )
receiver
Inv.
cited
Mayorga
Bacter
Waste
moLion upon conclusion
is
of
proceeciinos.
P'ship
(11th
has
15;
situated
*2
must al-so DISMISS Plaintiff's
(Doc.
Receiver.
Cir,
"when
defaL-rIr- judgmenr
enLer
Stone
may refile
Defendant Stone' s bankruptcv
The Court
Waste's
Judgrnenr as
v.
Stone's
case while
Defendant
against
Inc.
sjmi larfy
(citingr
Defendant
Lo
Fans,
not be entered
2015 WL 3556972, at
CourL
other
151.2 (11th
1499,
not
USA Corp.,. 2015 WL 12803630,
2AI5)
case,
the
if
Coast
outcomes for
Defendant Bacter
f.or
Bacter
so
Inq.,
this
with
improvidenL
Defendant
In
GuLf
Mega Travel
Sept.
& Pavers,
,.lefendant
iudqment should
inconsistent
in
shnrr'd
Jr.vu-'
_
140 F.2d
fnc.,
i qrs d,n, n- c- r " c
y . ! r J
!!oL!!"t
merits."
default
defendants. " Machado v.
at
the
I m p s. ,
may result
'r -hle-
'
dcf : -I'r'-r('.r
F
As a result,
1984).
ic
r^5i.cr
prevaiLs
defendant'
y
J\Jtttc!
Corp.
Motions
Federal
a
v.
see afso
Nat,I
IP
court
sits
Hous. Dev.,
Co.
*1
(N.D.
Ga.
Georoia
.sr^re
faw
at
governs
}aw
district
Appoint
to
v.
in
this
in
153 F.3d
Ceflner
Dec.
the
78,
Tech.
2008) .
case.
If
Plaintiff
wishes
receiver,
to
Pfaintlff
of
this
order
a
pursue
may fite
new motion
his
claim
within
citing
for
fifteen
the
appointment
days
fronr the
appropriate
lLg^a y
a
date
Law and
standards.
thi s
SO ORDERED
of
of June 2017
WILL]AM T. MOORE,
U N I T E D S T A T E SD ] S T R ] C T C O U R T
D
SOUTHERN ISTR]CT OE GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?