Williams v. Allen

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 to the extent that petition is dismissed, and that a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal are properly denied. The Court rejects the recommendation that Williams be denied in forma pauperis status and sanctioned $500. Williams is now WARNED that any more habeas (or similar) petitions he files without Eleventh Circuit authorization, are extremely likely to be considered vexatious and meet with sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/10/17. (slt)

Download PDF
flit iiuttb )tate 3ttritt OU for Me bouMern 38t0tritt of 4eorgj ,abannab flibi%ton 1! ED T PtcPR 1 fl .'" •fl I _j A IV. -j RONNIE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, V 4:16-CV-324 . MARTIN ALLEN, Warden, Respondent. ORDER Petitioner Ronnie Williams seeks habeas relief for at least the eleventh time.' He does not have the necessary authorization from the Eleventh Circuit to do so. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). This Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to consider his claims, and so his petition is DISMISSED. Hill v. Hopper, 112 F.3d 1088, 1089 (11th Cir. 1997) (per curiam); Wilson v. Lanier, No. CV406-99, 2006 WL 2949356 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 16, 2006). To this extent, the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, dkt. no. 5 is ADOPTED. But the Court REJECTS the recommendation that Williams be denied in forma pauperis status and sanctioned $500. Id. at 5. This Court previously told Williams: Nos. CV416-232 (S.D. Ga.); No. S151-10225 (Ga.); cv414-088 (S.D. Ga.); No. 2013-HC-27-JS (Tatnall Super. Ct.); CV412-019 (S.D. Ga.); CV408-105 (S.D. Ga.); CV405-167 (S.D. Ga.); CV403-069 (S.D. Ga.); CV402-044 (S.D. Ga.); CV495-176 (S.D. Ga.). AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) . In forma paperis [sic] (IFP) status will not be prospectively barred for any future pro se pleadings that do not address his claims that he has fully served his twenty year sentence for the 1994 burglary conviction, and he may still file any postconviction claim he wishes if he pays the filing fee . Report & Recommendation, No. CV416-232, Dkt. No. 6 at 5 n.3 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 19, 2016), adopted, Id. Dkt. No. 9 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 7, 2016). Williams's present petition takes issue with the timing and form of his current sentence. Dkt. No. 1 at 5, 7, 12. Those arguments are beyond the scope of the Court's previous warning, so Williams will not be sanctioned for this petition. No. CV416-232, Dkt. No. 6 at 5 n.3. However, Williams is now WARNED that any more habeas (or similar) petitions he files without Eleventh Circuit authorization, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h), are extremely likely to be considered vexatious and meet with sanctions. Finally, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that a Certificate of Appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal are properly DENIED SO ORDERED, . 2 Dkt. No. 5 at 6. this 10th day of March, 2017. LI GODBEY WO D, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ' The Court does not reach any other issues. See Dkt. No. 5 at 1 n.1, 4 n.2. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?