Bigglest v. Colvin
ORDERED that within 14 days of the date the Order is served, plaintiff shall file his opening brief setting forth his entitlement to judicial review or show cause why this case should not be dismissed on inactivity. ( Compliance due by 5/31/2017.). Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/16/17. (wwp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
JAMES A. BIGGLEST,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1 Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Plaintiff James Bigglest filed his Complaint seeking review of a
final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security in December 2016.
Doc. 1 (removal from Chatham County Superior Court). The parties
were served with the Court's General Order in Social Security cases,
explaining that plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 30 days
after the Commissioner files the Administrative Record. Doc. 5. The
Commissioner timely answered the Complaint and filed a copy of the
Administrative Record in February 2017. Doc. 9.
In lieu of filing his opening brief, Bigglest filed an unpermitted
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and has
been substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this
suit pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
"Response to Answer" arguing that Acting Commissioner Nancy
Berryhill's substitution as the nominal defendant somehow resets all the
deadlines and changes the very nature of the proceedings, since she must
personally review the Administrative Record and pleadings. Doc. 8.
There has been no further activity in this case. It is unclear what the
status of the case is, whether the parties have reached a stipulated
dismissal or remand, or whether plaintiff will continue to prosecute his
Plaintiff's belief that the Acting Commissioner personally reviews
and briefs cases does not, however, change his duty to file a meaningful,
specific "brief setting forth all errors which plaintiff contends entitle
[him] to relief." Doc. 5 at 1. He has failed to prosecute his case.
Therefore, within 14 days of the date this Order is served, plaintiff shall
either: (1) file his opening brief setting forth his entitlement to judicial
review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits, 2 or (2) otherwise show
To demonstrate entitlement to relief, plaintiff must set forth: (1) a short, plain
description of his alleged physical or emotional impairments, when he contends they
became disabling, and how the impairments prevent him from working; (2) a
summary of the administrative proceedings before the Social Security
Administration; and (3) a short, separate statement of each of his legal claims
explaining why the evidence does not support the Social Security Administration's
findings and denial of benefits. See generally, doe. 5, for further instructions.
cause why this case should not be dismissed on inactivity and, thus,
abandonment grounds. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); S.D. Ga. L.R. 41.1(c).;
Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 1 630-31 (1962) (courts have the
inherent authority to dismiss claims for lack of prosecution); Mingo v.
Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v.
Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Floyd v. United States,
CV491-277 (S.D. Ga. June 10, 1992). Failure to respond to this Order
will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.
SO ORDERED, this 16th day of May, 2017.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?