Green v. United States of America

Filing 17

ORDER denying 16 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 6/29/17. (wwp)

.. , - '.:';

D1$T;tir.;T i
U.S,
il01i;1
rN TIIE uNrrED srATEs DrsrRf,cr couRT FoRsl:s',:..trlili0iV.
THE SOUTHERN
DTSTRTCTOF GEORGTA
,nr?\'u]r '_
:t ?Q pl| ?:11
7 I rr L- }1'
sAvAl{t{AH

DMSION

TIMECKA GREEN,
D^1.iti^h6v

CASENOS. CV41]-OO1
c R 4 1 5- 2 0 4
UNITED STATES OE AMERICA,
P^<r'\/-\n.lanf

Before
12) ,

which

(Doc. 15)

the
this

court

to

Court

an appeal

first

Peti-tioner

a

has

Court

Clrcuit

Pursuant

taken

in

COA. This
substantial

right.

Slack

has carefully

v.

showing
McDaniel,

considered

28

matter

529

directed
of

U.S.C.

the

only

denial

U'S.

PeEitioner's

413,

S
the

unless

may issue
of

(Doc'

Certificate

to

this

certificate

made a

The Court

for

15.)

be

has

Appeals

as a Motion

construe
(Doc.

of

Appeal

of

Notice

Petitioner's

may not

issues

constitutional
(2000).

Eleventh

("COA-) .1

Appealability
2253\c\,

is

Court

the

of

if
a
484

case and

l This Court must point out Ehat it has expressly denied such a
the Court adopted (Doc. 10) the
request on two occasions. First,
(Doc. 7) , which
it
R e p o r t a n d R e c o m ' r r e n d ao n
Judge's
Magistrate
has
Petitioner
not receive a COA. Because it
recornrnendedthat
the
Circuit
in the past'
for
the Eleventh
been insufficient
-L'^- -^ '-OA should issue in that
^L*a - Y L , "
-^T
a n ' r r - F l s . r e -v !n JrJeYs s l "
D
L
-^ v e
r
(Doc. 10 at
is
that
stif -L not
1. ) Apparently.
order.
same
c n o r r o h- T h e F l e \ / e n f h C i r c u i t
not/ con'nands this Court to construe
notice of appeal As yet another request for a COA
Petitioner's
is
of whethel: Petitioner
determihation
requires
a third
that
time is tne
Hopeful Iy, che third
Eo rhe cercificate.
enritled
charm,

finds

that

requesr

by

woul-d be
f-er-

he cannot

i f i.^l-F

Petirioner

moot.
.\f

rneet the
for

Accordingly,
Anna:':hr

''t\/

So ORDERtrtnts Z?tday
D

above standard.

leave

!o

appeal

Pet.itioner's
1f...

12\

rS

As a result,
in

forma

construed

any

pauperis

Motion

DENIED.

of June 2017

W I L I , I A M T . M O O R E ,J
U N ] T E D S T A T E S D JS T R CT COURT
D
IA
S O U T H E R N I S T R I C T O T GEORG

for