Hopes v. Correct Health et al
Filing
24
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration. Any implicit request to amend the judgment entered in this case is also DENIED. See dkt. no. 22. This case stands DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/19/17. (jlm)
tiSmteti States! IBtsitrtct Court
^outliem IBtOtritt ot 4^eorsta
^obannali Bibtotott
MANVEL OMAR HOPES,
Plaintiff,
CV 417-079
V.
CORRECT HEALTH,
SHERIFF JOHN WILCHER,
et al..
Defendants.
ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Manvel Omar Hopes filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983
case
against
individuals
and
entities
he
contends
are
responsible for injuries he suffered in a slip-and-fall accident
at Chatham County Jail.
recommended
claim.
that
his
See dkt. no.
See dkt.
no. 1.
dismissed
case
be
15.
The Court adopted the recommendation,
after no objection was timely filed,
Dkt.
Nos.
17 & 18.
for
After judgment was entered,
Dkt.
also
its
Magistrate
the
Court
Judge's
construed Hopes'
failing
to
reconsider
recommendation.
to
state
a
and judgment was entered.
more time to prepare his objections.
moved
The Magistrate Judge
Dkt.
Hopes requested
Nos.
19 & 20.
He
Order
adopting
the
No.
21.
The
Court
various requests as a timely motion to alter or
amend the judgment and directed him to submit any materials he
contends affect the disposition of his claims.
1
Dkt. No.
22.
He
complied.
Court
Dkt. No. 23
considers
whether
(Amended Complaint).
that
new material
Accordingly, the
changes
this
case's
disposition.
Hopes' Amended Complaint provides additional details on the
circumstances of his slip-and-fall accident.^
If
with dkt. no. 23.
Compare dkt. no.
He explains that he believes the cleaning
product used on the bathroom floor at Chatham County Jail is
inappropriate for that purpose, and that its regular use created
a
hazard to which other inmates have succumbed.
4-5.
He
has
not,
however,
presented
any
Dkt.
fact
No.
or
23 at
argument
suggesting that his accident was anything more than the result—
at
worst—of
^'[c]ourts
not
^
give
Hopes'
prison
have
rise
employees'
negligence.
regularly held that
to
Amended
federal
causes
Complaint
adds
slip
of
and
In
that
fall
action."
allegations
regard,
accidents
Davis
concerning
do
v.
his
medical
care:
specifically
that
his
transfer
to
Georgia
Diagnostics
and
Classification
Prison
(GDCP)
in
Jackson,
Georgia, prevented him from receiving a recommended MRI.
See
dkt. no. 23 at 7.
The facts underlying this claim are vague.
His allegations imply that the MRI was scheduled, but that he
was transferred "two weeks prior."
Id.
His change-of-address
notice to the Court indicates that he was transferred on May 17,
2017.
Dkt. No. 12 at 1.
His allegation implies, therefore,
that he was scheduled to receive an MRI in early June 2017.
It
does not necessarily imply, however, that the treatment has been
anything more than delayed.
Further, if he alleges that GDCP
medical
staff are
deliberately indifferent
to
his
serious
medical needs, venue for such a claim would lie in the Middle
District of Georgia.
See 28 U.S.C. § 90(b)(2)
(stating that
Butts County, in which Jackson is located, is in the Macon
Division
of
the
Middle
District
of
Georgia).
The
new
allegations, therefore, provide no reason to revisit the Court's
disposition of his original claim.
Corrections Corp.
(N.D.
Fla.
Ankoh,
No.
2006)
(prisoner's
floor
Feb.
of Am.,
22,
2008)
I:04cv37,
cleaner
and
No.
5:07cv279,
(collecting cases);
2006 WL 2583370,
allegations
lack
of
2008 WL 539057,
^'that
at
*1
the
adequate
see also Wynn v.
(M.D.
Ga.
caused his
Sept.
6,
choice
prison ['s]
shoes
at *3
of
fall
and
injuries" alleged only negligence and failed to state a § 1983
claim).
His proposed amendment,
therefore,
does not affect the
Magistrate Judge's analysis or the Court's judgment.
Accordingly,
the Court DENIES Hopes'
request to reconsider
its Order adopting the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.
No.
this
21.
case
Dkt.
Any implicit request to amend the judgment entered in
is
also
DENIED.
See
dkt.
no.
22.
This
case
DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED, this 19™ day of September, 2017.
HON.
LISA GODBEY WOOD,
UNITED
STATES
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT
JUDGE
COURT
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
stands
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?