Bacon v. Georgia State Prison

Filing 8

ORDER denying 6 Motion for injunctive relief; denying 7 Motion for interlocutory appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/21/17. (wwp)

rN ?HE uNrrED s"A?Es DrsTRrcr coIrtrsFBYbTRtcTcouRT
THE SoUTHERN
DISTRICT oF GEoRq$8\.rthern
Districtof cA
DIVI SION

Filed In Office
.
M.
--*--Q[IT-

zdl__

TERRY BACON,
D-t;

DePuty Clerk

t i ^-ar

CASENO. CV417_OBO

V.

GEORGfASTATE PRTSON,
Pa-n^n,-Jan].

ORDER

Before

the

is

Court
(Doc,

Injuncrive

Relief

fn

Forma

Pauperis

Petitioner's

motions

Terry

Petitioner
6)

and Motion

(Doc.

1).

Bacon's

Interlocutory

for

For

Motion

the

following

for

AppeaI
reasons,

are both DENIED.
l

In

his

Petj t-roner

enLirety

vaguely
'1
,

On June,

A.)

Motion

2 0 1 1,

has

Pet Ltjoner

that

would warranL

that

Petitioner

an

appeaf

issues

a

issue

only

requesls

of

is

his

an

S 2254 peti tion

as

current

case

j nterl,ocutory
to

Certificate

taken
of

in

this

Appealability,

to

dismissing

before
RaLher,

appeal.

(Doc 7. )
Ehe
(Doc.

successi ve,

pending

appeal

Forma Pauperis,

appea1."

order

attempting

be

In

'tinLerlocutory

habeas cLaim. Pursuant

may not

rf

no

$n

Appeal

Cou.rc Lssued an

Lhis

Pecitjoner's

of

dismlssaf

I nte!l-ocut.ory

For

this

it

Court/ s

28 U.S.C.

matter

rhis

unfess

This

PeLit j.oner has made a substant ial

Court
appears
earller

S 2253\c),
the

court

certlficate
showjng of

may
the

denj al

of

consrir-urional

a

righr.

alv

u.>

413, 484 (2000) .
his

In

motion,
showjng

subsLanrial
Allhnrrnh

.'liffi.rrlt

discernjble

AppeaI

r

also
aarr

cf
irinnar

riocq

Pecicioner's

MoLion

in

forma pauperis

difiiculr
:-

Motion

for

s

,nnaf

Lhe

requesced

-rrli

srJi t-f : r'1a I

< .o^
fi r . h ! u /\

lor

any

is

of

LnrerlocuLory
Per.icioner

on appeal,

in^n

in

i,,h-+

injuncrion
fnr

hasis

/ o ^ P ll o f
\" vn

^ , " ir^Y
^
,

i^r

In

Lhls

j-s

reguesL

entitled

not

\

unclear.
ini

F"rp.lri

at
Fh-l-

I

moLion,

u^,.'^,?ar

to

-lz

Court

rr

Ca'arai

( S. D .
-

-:nn^t-

Ga.

la--r.i

an

chis

tOI

underlying
is

unable

to

No.

July
rr

4:15-

6,

a

m. a L oL - ]
, , r! l

equall y

Pecitioner

FL'^

Wirhout

rrr-tinr-

is

Rel ief

this

/T.-l

q6a

h'q

3 6 16 6 2 6 ,
ai

5.)

is

ra.flraql

WL

lnluncLive

(Doc,

l ! r I U V 4 l l J q / r \ L J . /

iti

2016

o r o v i. .c J
d -

l i-,,
ry.

decipher.

to

Dar

^hi
A JP -n rn n ^E a r a u f r r

nvf

-:aht

a CerLificaLe

To rhe extenL

olNrno.]

r.n^l

nr-\t

granring

is

provide

to

/-n"rcFiirrl

D X S M I S S E D S M O O Tb e c a u s e P e t i t i o n e r
A

ificrFo

CV-163.

Pcr

faifed

wou-Ld warranL

rhar

proceed

to

has

denial
I nr,r

Therefore,

Pelitjoner'

/ ru n n y - u f
rrhl
\ r

fnl

In ['orma Pauperis

requescing
is

a

of
f^

clajm

Appealabi 1ity,

Petltioner

2016)

dofe

out

' The
request could be read as
Court also finds that Petitioner's
s e e k i n g p e r m i s s i o n f r o m t h e E l e v e n t h C i r c u i L C o u r L o f A p p e aL s t o
alLow this Court to consider a successive habeas petitlon
fifed
by Pecitioner,
To Lhe extenc this is the case, PeciLioner's
ttocion for Interloculory
Appeal fn Forma Pauperis should be
DENIED because such a reguest must be filed
in that court.

i ni

rrnrt

i rra

i rr r i e r l i n r

i pf

ral

i n n :

l

}^i.aei <

Moreover,

ro

arLempEed fl li ng
al so

f aj l.

As

rnr

dni

the

absence

the

1n

na

noted

t,nr]ar'l

vi

nrr

<url/\

exrenL

P e Li L i o n e r ' s

rhat

another

of

of

S

previoudly

2254 petitionf
by

Lhi s

fnr

h:ha-ac

requesc

rhaL

CourL,

is

an

c.Laim must

Per.ir ioner

has

l
:l

ra:r]rr

i h{.

Filad

Renorr

was

nrrmsr.\rlq

arrJ

Rcrormenrjar

to

instructed

Cjrcuir

CourL of

cd',':tron

lnsin^:rcq

fnr

Elevenrh

^rionte.l

filing

.r.>n-inn

Circuit

-rirrnr:f i rre Pel i cf

Lo

nf

Jcn'r

Petit

ini|naj-

file

lh:s

a

ion

from

-oner

hahFis

f a

has
.\hr :rin

habeas

the

chis

p

75t

-

1d,

e-l

his

Eleventh
successive

CourL Jacks
n eLfT i t i o n .
IJL
1?11

F-.-n

Mocion

's DENIED,

or/f
SO ORDERED hj s frt '4ut
L

n f

qan,

WII],IAM

aml-ra

T.

r

) a1

'l^

\

I21B

r. v^I J ! v v l n9 r . r \ / i 7 ' r F
J

na-miqcinn

peLition.

)

pFl- il- loner

an addiEional

Cnrr

or

/ftnr-

a^rrr.

<r-nnassive

Recause
a*

ial

permission,

r-.nqiz'taFla

hv

rpl

permission

obtain

Appeals before

qFcr\/-

^ n 1 ' 4\

/11Frl-r:e ie

To
v

first

i -n

(Id, ) Vl/ithout this

habeas petiLion.
itrrr

nar-irinne

1

MOORE,

U N I T E D S T A T E SD I S T R I C T C O U R T
SOUTHERN ISTRICT OF GEORGTA
D

2

the

lar