Azmat v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 129

ORDER denying as moot Petitioner's 126 Motion for Reconsideration 125 Order. Petitioner's request for the Court to re-review the record and find/verify that Dr. Azmat's indictment was fraudulently obtained and order the U.S. Attorney to respond to claims of improper conduct by assistant U.S. Attorneys is denied. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 1/10/2022. (ca) Modified on 1/10/2022 (thb).

Case 4:17-cv-00086-WTM-BKE Document 129 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION

NAJAM AZiyiAT,

Petitioner,
CASE NOS. CV417-086

V.

CR413-028

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

ORDER

Before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration.^

(Doc. 126.) In his motion. Petitioner asks the Court to reconsider

its

order

making

the

United

States

Court

of

Appeals for

the

Eleventh Circuit's order the order of this Court and ^^inform[] the

Circuit Court to correct its error" in dismissing his appeal for

failure to pay the filing fee in a timely manner. (Id. at 1, 3.)
The Government has opposed Petitioner's motion. (Doc. 127.) On
December 14, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit informed the Court that

Petitioner's Appeal had been reinstated. (Doc. 128.) Because the

^ Unless otherwise stated, all citations are to Petitioner's civil
docket on this Court's electronic filing system, CV417-086.

Case 4:17-cv-00086-WTM-BKE Document 129 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2

Eleventh Circuit has already effectuated the relief Petitioner
seeks, his motion (Doc. 126) is DENIED AS MOOT.^

SO ORDERED this /^^day of January 2022.
WILLIAM T. MOORJ^ JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN

2

Petitioner

also

asks

the

Court

to

DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

'"re-review

the

record

and

find/verify
that
Dr.
Azmat's
indictment
was
fraudulently
obtained[,]" "order the US Attorney to voluntarily withdraw the
fraudulently obtained indictment[,]" and order the U.S. Attorney

to respond to claims of improper conduct by assistant U.S.
Attorneys. (Doc. 126 at 3, 4, 5.) "Motions for reconsideration
'should not be used to relitigate issues which have already been
found lacking. " Irvin v. Coleman, No. 5:20-cv-38, 2020 WL
'
7250279, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 18, 2020). Accordingly, Petitioner's
request to review these issues is also DENIED.