Brown v. Pontus LLC et al
Filing
31
ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file within twenty-one days from the date of this order either the proposed settlement agreement for this Court's review or a brief detailing why the parties should not have to file a proposed settlement for the Court's review. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/19/18. (loh)
U S Oio'.T;XT CCUiU
s z:-m:.v:ixh div.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGliP
I
PM M-2b
SAVANNAH DIVISION
'SO.DiST. Or GA.
DIXIE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. CV417-202
V.
PONTUS LLC and IVAYLO
DIMITRIV,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before
the
Court
is
the
parties'
Stipulation
of
Dismissal. (Doc. 30.) Typically, a plaintiff may dismiss an
action by filing "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all
parties
who
have
41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
appeared."
In
this
Fed.
case,
R.
of
however,
the
Civ.
P.
parties'
stipulation is improper at this time.
In her complaint. Plaintiff Brown brought suit seeking
damages arising from an alleged sexual assault, employment
discrimination under Tile VII of the Civil Rights Act, and
violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). (Doc.
10.)
Because
Plaintiff's
violations of the
proposed
complaint
sought
recovery
FLSA, this Court must first review
settlement
terms
before
properly dismissed. See Dees
v.
this
action
can
for
any
be
Hydradry, Inc., 706 F.
Supp. 2d 1227, 1231 (M.D. Fla. 2010) ("Although a private
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?