Brown v. Pontus LLC et al

Filing 31

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file within twenty-one days from the date of this order either the proposed settlement agreement for this Court's review or a brief detailing why the parties should not have to file a proposed settlement for the Court's review. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/19/18. (loh)

Download PDF
U S Oio'.T;XT CCUiU s z:-m:.v:ixh div. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGliP I PM M-2b SAVANNAH DIVISION 'SO.DiST. Or GA. DIXIE BROWN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV417-202 V. PONTUS LLC and IVAYLO DIMITRIV, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal. (Doc. 30.) Typically, a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). appeared." In this Fed. case, R. of however, the Civ. P. parties' stipulation is improper at this time. In her complaint. Plaintiff Brown brought suit seeking damages arising from an alleged sexual assault, employment discrimination under Tile VII of the Civil Rights Act, and violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). (Doc. 10.) Because Plaintiff's violations of the proposed complaint sought recovery FLSA, this Court must first review settlement terms before properly dismissed. See Dees v. this action can for any be Hydradry, Inc., 706 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 1231 (M.D. Fla. 2010) ("Although a private

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?