Barr v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
Filing
25
ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/29/19. (loh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION
ALEX BARR,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
CV417-203
)
NICHOLAS SILBERG,
Defendant.
)
)
)
ORDER
The parties were previously directed to hold a Rule 26(f) conference
within fourteen days from the filing of defendant’s answer, and to file a
Rule 26(f) Report within seven days of that conference. Doc. 19. To this
date, no such report has been filed with the Court. The parties are
DIRECTED to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed
for failure to follow a Court order. See L.R. 41(b); see Link v. Wabash
R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (courts have the inherent authority
to dismiss claims for lack of prosecution); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers
Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d
1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Floyd v. United States, CV491-277 (S.D. Ga.
June 10, 1992).
SO ORDERED, this 29th day of October, 2019.
______________________________
________________________
_
_ _
CHRISTOPHER L. RAY
HRISTOPHER
R S OPH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?