Barr v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Filing 25

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/29/19. (loh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION ALEX BARR, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) CV417-203 ) NICHOLAS SILBERG, Defendant. ) ) ) ORDER The parties were previously directed to hold a Rule 26(f) conference within fourteen days from the filing of defendant’s answer, and to file a Rule 26(f) Report within seven days of that conference. Doc. 19. To this date, no such report has been filed with the Court. The parties are DIRECTED to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. See L.R. 41(b); see Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (courts have the inherent authority to dismiss claims for lack of prosecution); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Jones v. Graham, 709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983); Floyd v. United States, CV491-277 (S.D. Ga. June 10, 1992). SO ORDERED, this 29th day of October, 2019. ______________________________ ________________________ _ _ _ CHRISTOPHER L. RAY HRISTOPHER R S OPH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?