Reeves Construction Company v. Baker Constructors, Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting re 47 Motion to Seal Response in Opposition re 41 MOTION to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 11/8/18. (loh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION CAS&^

REEVES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

NO.4:18-cv-00073-R^-JECS
Plaintiff,
V.

on

BAKER CONSTRUCTORS,INC.,
STOY MARLOW,and
BRIAN REGENHARDT
Defendants.
ORDER

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff Reeves Construction Company's("Reeves" or

"Plaintiff') Motion to File Under Seal its Response in Opposition to the Motion of Robert Baker
and R.B. Baker Holdings, LLC to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas(ECF No. 41). Reeves moves

pursuant to S.D. Ga, L.R. 79.7 to file its response under seal because the response relies upon
and incorporates confidential information, specifically, emails designated by Defendant Marlow
as "Confidential" under the parties' Protective Order(ECF No. 33). ECF No. 33 permits a party

to designate discovery materials as "Confidential" where such materials contain or reflect

nonpublic, confidential, personal, financial, or proprietary or commercially sensitive information.
Reeves requests that its filing remain permanently sealed in accordance with ECF No. 33
because the at-issue emails have been designated by Marlow as "Confidential" under ECF No.
33, and no party has challenged that designation. The Court agrees and finds that temporary
sealing of this filing is not adequate to protect the interest at stake.
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN,Reeves's motion is hereby granted. Reeves is granted

leave to file its Response in Opposition to the Motion of Robert Baker and R.B. Baker Holdings,