Maleeah v. Awe et al

Filing 31

ORDER adopting in part and declines to adopt in part 14 Report and Recommendations. The Court agrees that Defendant Awe should be DISMISSED from this action. Moreover, the court agrees that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Brown, Darcy, Terry, Tyler, Green, and Anderson must remain in this action. With respect to Defendant Brown, however, the Court disagrees with the Magistrate Judge and finds that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Brown should not be dismissed from this ac tion. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order, along with Plaintiff's complaint, to the Marshal for service to Defendant Brown. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 1/15/19. (trb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/16/2019: # 1 USM 285 Form) (trb).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION CAGER A. MALEEAH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV418-096 V. DR. OLATUNJI AWE, DR. BROWN, P.A. DARCY, NURSE GRANT, NURSE TYLER, NURSE ANDERSON, and NURSE GREEN, P S.O O- Defendants. c/i >r'n. ORDER 5 rE og Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Re port)^ ar!9P "CO C3 Recommendation (Doc. 14), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 21). In the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff properly alleged claims against Defendants Darcy, Terry, Tyler, Green, and Anderson. (Doc. 14.) The Magistrate Judge, however, recommended that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Awe and Brown be dismissed. (Id.) The Magistrate Judge concluded that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Awe and Brown failed because Plaintiff failed to provide any factual basis to support a finding that either Defendant was directly involved in providing Plaintiff's medical care. After a careful review of the record and Plaintiff's objections, this Court can only partially agree. o

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?