Oliver v. County of Effingham et al

Filing 60

ORDER finding as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 38 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 44 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 47 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 49 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 50 Motion to Withdra w ; finding as moot 57 Motion for Extension of Time; finding as moot 58 Report and Recommendations.; granting 59 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 12 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss. This action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/18/18. (wwp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION ANTHONY OLIVER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:18-cv-120 v. EFFINGHAM COUNTY; JIMMY MCDUFFIE; DANIEL HANDSHUMAKER; CHRISTOPHER CARY; and MATTHEW LOGAN, Defendants. ORDER After the Magistrate Judge recommended imposing conditions on Plaintiff Anthony Oliver’s prosecution of this case, (doc. 58), Oliver moved to voluntarily dismiss the action. (Doc. 59). That request is unopposed. See S.D. Ga. L. Civ. R. 7.5 (failure to timely respond to a motion indicates no opposition). It is, therefore, GRANTED. (Doc. 59). The dismissal renders the recommended conditions, and all other pending motions, moot. DISMISSED without prejudice and the Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED, this 18th day of March, 2019. R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA This action is

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?