Kennedy v. Electric Insurance Company

Filing 45

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion in Limine. Motions in Limine 41 and 42 are construed as Motions for Summary Judgment. The parties are required to file any supplement ten days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 3/24/20. (jrb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SAVANNAH DIVISION

ORDER

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
CONSTRUED AS
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BACKGROUND

Id.

Id.

Id.
Id.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Id.

i.e.
Id.

Id.

ANALYSIS

GRANTED

Id.

Id.

Daubert

DENIED
Id.
GRANTED

are

Id.

Co v. ESLU, Inc.

Trustmark Ins.

Id.

Id.

Id.

Id.

Luce v. United States
Motion in Limine, Black’s Law Dictionary
in limine. E.g.,
Fed. Prac. & Proc.
See Meyer Intellectual
Props. Ltd. v. Bodum, Inc.,
in limine
Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi
Trading Co.,

Gold Cross Ems, Inc. v. Children’s Hospital of Ala.

See, e.g., Plaza South Assoc., Inc. v. QBE Ins. Corp.

Hatch v. GeoVera Specialty Ins. Co.

see contra Ins. House, Inc. v. Ins. Data Processing Inc.

Gold Cross

should

White v. Kaminsky

Hertz Equip. Rental. Corp v. Evans
both
See, e.g.

See, e.g.,

CONCLUSION

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

CONSTRUED AS
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SO ORDERED,