Chapman v. Wilcher et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, Dismisses without prejudice Chapman's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, Directs the Clerk of Court to Close this case and enter the appropriate judgment, and Denies Chapman in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/11/2022. (ca)
Case 4:20-cv-00124-RSB-BWC Document 8 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:20-cv-124
SHERIFF JOHN T. WILCHER,
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
Petitioner Jake Chapman
(“Chapman”) did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. 1 Accordingly, the Court
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court,
DISMISSES without prejudice Chapman’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, DIRECTS the Clerk of
Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment, and DENIES Chapman in forma
pauperis status on appeal.
SO ORDERED, this 11th day of January, 2022.
R. STAN BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
In fact, the Court’s mailing was returned as undeliverable, with the notations: “No longer at this address”
and “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward.” (Doc. 7.) Chapman’s failure
to notify the Court of any change in his address provides a separate, independent reason to dismiss his
habeas petition. Local R. 11.1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?