Hauger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 28

ORDERED that the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action. Within forty-five (45) days of the date this Order is entered, the parties if they wish may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Proc edure 41(a)(2), incorporating the terms of their settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. In the alternative, the parties may simply file a joint stipulation of dismissal. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 2/7/24. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION JOHN HAUGER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:23-cv-303 v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER On January 31, 2024, counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant have advised the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this matter and that they intend to file a joint stipulation of dismissal once the settlement is completed. (Doc. 26.) Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action. See Heape v. Flanagan, No. 6:07-CV-12, 2008 WL 2439736 (S.D. Ga. June 9, 2008). Within forty-five (45) days of the date this Order is entered, the parties—if they wish— may present a dismissal judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), incorporating the terms of their settlement, so the Court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. In the alternative, the parties may simply file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the parties fail to file a dismissal (or, if necessary, move to reopen the case) within forty-five (45) days, the Court will sua sponte dismiss the case with prejudice. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381–82 (1994). SO ORDERED, this 7th day of February, 2024. R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?