Elmore v. Cooper et al

Filing 231

ORDER denying 222 Motion ; denying 228 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 8/22/2011. (loh)

Download PDF
c.n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Al WAYCROSS DIVISION zoUiG Z2 EIMON MCCARROLL ELMORE, JR., Plaintiff, V. CASE NO. CV508-004 ASSISTANT WARDEN PEGGY ANN COOPER, Coffee Correctional Facility, individually and in her official capacity, and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Tennessee Corporation, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge the Record (Doe. 222) and Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 228). After a careful review, the Court finds no merit to Plaintiff's request to add to the record in this case. Therefore, his Motion to Enlarge the Record is DENIED. In this case, "[a] n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3); see Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) (3) (A). After careful consideration, the Court finds that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith. Plaintiff is clearly not entitled to a reopening of the time to file an appeal from this Court's order granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's case. this Court's In addition, an appeal of order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment would be frivolous. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis is DENIED. -p SO ORDERED this 22 — day of August 2011. WILLIAM T. MOORE, J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?