Phillips v. Astrue

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge for 22 Report and Recommendations; the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. The Clerk is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/30/2011. (ca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA WAYCROSS DIVISION MYRA DANETTE HENDRIX PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV5II-010 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER After an independent review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In her Objections, Plaintiff Myra Phillips ("Plaintiff") disagrees with the Magistrate Judge's determinations as to the three (3) enumerations of error set forth in her Brief. It appears Plaintiff desires the Court to reweigh the evidence and/or decide the facts in her favor. As Plaintiff is aware and as noted by the Magistrate Judge, this Court's role is to determine whether the Administrative Law Judge's findings are supported by substantial evidence and are based on the correct legal standards. The Magistrate Judge clearly was guided by these strictures in recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Plaintiffs Objections are overruled The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. SO ORDERED, this day of 2011. USA GODBEYW000, CHIEF JUDGE 1NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?