Spiker v. Colvin

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, Defendant's Objections are overruled. The decision of the Commissioner is remanded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/18/2014. (ca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA WAYCROSS DIVISION DAVID SPIKER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV513-048 V. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Defendant filed Objections. In her Objections, Defendant asserts that the Administrative Law Judge ("AU") gave explicit reasons based on good cause to reject the opinions of Plaintiffs treating physicians. As a result, Defendant asserts that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be rejected. While it is clear that the ALJ properly rejected the treating physicians' conclusion that Plaintiff is unable to work, it is not clear whether the AL's rejection of the treating physicians' medical opinions had a proper basis. Rather, the AL's rejections are so intertwined with each other that this Court cannot discern on what basis the AU rejected the medical opinions of Plaintiffs treating physicians. AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) Defendant's Objections are overruled. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. SOORDERED,this _ dayof 2014. LISA GQDBEY WOOD, CHIEF1UDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8182)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?