Williams v. Currie

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge dismissing as moot 6 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing the petition for writ of habeas. Williams' Objections are without merit and are overruled. The Clerk is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/8/2014. (ca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA WAYCROSS DIVISION FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV513-112 V. RICHARD E. CURRIE, Respondent. ORDER After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Petitioner Franklin Williams ('Williams") filed Objections. In his Objections, Williams states that he is factually innocent of the offenses for which he was convicted, he is suffering from a fundamental miscarriage of justice, and the savings clause (presumably contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e)) is ineffective and inadequate to challenge the legality of his detention. Williams' Objections offer nothing more or different than what he stated in his initial filings. Williams' Objections are without merit and are overruled. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Williams' AO 72A (Rev. 8/82) petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DISMISSED. Williams'Motion for Summary Judgment is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dinhissal. 1sIORDERED, bJSA GODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE LITEp STATES DISTRICT COURT SUTV1ERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?