Williams v. United States of America
Filing
12
ORDER denying 4 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 8 Report and Recommendations dismissing this case; denying 11 Motion and request to correct sentence. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/28/2014. (loh)
U. S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGI*i I r' '$3
I
WAYCROSS DIVISION
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
CASE NOS. CV513-129
CR506-014
V.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 8), to which objections have been
filed (Doc. 10). After a careful de novo review of the
record, the Court concludes that Petitioner's objections
are without merit. Accordingly, the report and
recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this
case, and Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition
DISMISSED.
is
In addition, Petitioner's Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 4) and Motion and Request to Correct
Sentence (Doc. 11) are both DENIED. The Clerk of Court is
DIRECTED to close this case.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), an appeal may not be
taken in this matter unless the court issues a Certificate
of Appealability. This certificate may issue only if
Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of
a constitutional right.
484 (2000) .
Slack
V.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
After careful consideration, the Court finds
no issues in this case that merit the issuance of a
Certificate of Appealability. As a result, any request for
leave to appeal in forma pauperis must be
DISMISSED AS
MOOT.
SO ORDERED this
W06day
.?
of May 2014.
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?