Williams v. United States of America

Filing 12

ORDER denying 4 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 8 Report and Recommendations dismissing this case; denying 11 Motion and request to correct sentence. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/28/2014. (loh)

Download PDF
U. S IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGI*i I r' '$3 I WAYCROSS DIVISION FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, CASE NOS. CV513-129 CR506-014 V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 10). After a careful de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case, and Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition DISMISSED. is In addition, Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 4) and Motion and Request to Correct Sentence (Doc. 11) are both DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), an appeal may not be taken in this matter unless the court issues a Certificate of Appealability. This certificate may issue only if Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 484 (2000) . Slack V. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, After careful consideration, the Court finds no issues in this case that merit the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability. As a result, any request for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must be DISMISSED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED this W06day .? of May 2014. WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?